European Music Analysis and the Politics of Identity (special issue of Danish Musicology Online)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
speech "Music Theory's White Racial Frame" at the 2019 meeting of the Society for Music Theory became a watershed event, the reverberations of which are still felt throughout musicology.Ewell's speech and his subsequently published expanded article (2020) gave rise to a state of public attention that the field of music theory has arguably never seen before.Ewell's claim was as simple as it was powerful: Music theory is white-literally and figuratively.Literally because the overwhelming majority of the members of the North American (i.e. the United States and Canada) Society for Music Theory are white, and figuratively because North American music theory is characterized by its "white racial frame," a term Ewell (2020, 2.1) borrowed from Joe Feagin ([2009] 2013) to denote how "music theory has many of the prejudices and stereotypes that are part of the white racial frame, most noticeably in how we privilege the compositional and theoretical work of whites over nonwhites."Ewell backed up his claim with a case study on the most influential music theorist in the United States, Heinrich Schenker, arguing that Schenker's racism and nationalism permeated his music theory and that it had been "whitewashed" by generations of US music theorists who failed to acknowledge and face the grim sides of his theory.The public debate seriously began when the infamous "Symposium on Philip Ewell's SMT 2019 Plenary Paper, 'Music Theory's White Racial Frame'" was published in the twelfth issue of Journal of Schenkerian Studies (henceforth JSS12).This symposium, to which Ewell had not been invited to respond, was seriously stained by dubious scholarly practices such as ad hominem attacks on Ewell and an anonymous contribution.The widespread critique of the issue ultimately prompted a formal investigation of the conception and review process of JSS12 which found several structural problems. 1During the Summer of 2020-in the wake of the brutal police killing of George Floyd and renewed attention to the Black Lives Matter movement-the debate reached popular media outlets such as Fox News, the New York Times, the New Yorker, and more, and it also spread to European forums.The public debate is often especially high-pitched when it comes to areas bordering on "identity politics."That this is a general phenomenon, is, for instance, seen currently in the ways that Critical Race Theory is heavily debated and largely misunderstood in political discourse in the United States; and in Denmark, the very term " identity politics" has been a most disputed concept in recent years (we put the term
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,026 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».