Collaborative competitive relationships within an integrated public sector network
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
A phenomenon of recent times has been the increased complexity of society's problems and the need for organizations to work together to find solutions while in competition with each other for scarce resources. This has created the need to better understand how organizations can best collaborate under such conditions. A qualitative study was conducted. In all, twenty-one participants were purposefully selected through snowball sampling and interviewed. These were individuals who represented their organizations in an interorganizational effort to address mutual benefits or common interests through a process of information exchange and resource sharing. The nature of interorganizational relationships was determined by each participant verbalizing the contents and meanings of the contacts of his/her organization with other organizations within the action set. Results revealed that organizations that control vital resources to the operations of others are in a position to control the actions of others. They also revealed that social relationships developed through organizational interaction with the environment both facilitate and constrain organizational action. Most notably, organizations in relationships of dependency with the government can use social capital to access social networks in their communities to build countervailing power to change a relationship of compliance to one of collaboration. In addition, results reveled that collaboration is most likely to occur when organizations perceive their actions toward goal attainment to facilitate each other's goals and less likely to occur if there is a lack of perceived interdependence, a lack of shared ideology, and a lack of trust. This study's findings reveal the importance of forging social networks to gain leverage over constraining dependencies in resource dependence relationships. This study examines collaborative relationships in an action set of five national non-government AIDS organizations (NGOs) competing for funds, and having Health Canada as their main funder. The aim of the study was to better understand how social relationships embedded in the organizational environment shape interorganizational collaboration in relationships of dependency and what conditions support such organizational behavior. Resource dependence theory was used as the conceptual schema for explaining organizational behavior observed under conditions of resource scarcity, interdependence, and uncertainty, as these are key variables in relationship building among these organizations.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,012 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,008 | 0,005 |
| Communication savante | 0,007 | 0,009 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,007 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,009 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».