From Policy to Practice: Educators’ Sensemaking and Implementation of Assessment and Evaluation During the COVID-19 Pandemic
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The COVID-19 pandemic had a profound impact on how teachers engaged with educational policy. During this period, teachers were met with the challenging task of bridging their existing understandings of educational policy with COVID-19 directives issued by the provincial government, to form new implementation strategies. This study examines how fourteen secondary school teachers from various schools and school boards across Ontario, Canada, navigated student assessment and evaluation during the COVID-19 pandemic. The study is multi-faceted: it begins by exploring teachers’ initial understanding of assessment and evaluation, with a particular focus on their knowledge, interpretation, and implementation of the policy document Growing Success: Assessment, Evaluation, and Reporting in Schools (2010) in their pedagogical practices. The study then examines how their approaches to assessment and evaluation evolved in response to COVID-19 directives, as well as the challenges they encountered in their teaching during the pandemic. The findings suggest that teachers’ sensemaking of assessment and evaluation is shaped by their knowledge of the Growing Success policy and their cumulative experiences with implementation over time. After the release of COVID-19 directives, teachers engaged in both individual and collective sensemaking to interpret, adapt, and integrate these new government directives into their teaching practices. However, the challenges posed by assessing and evaluating students during the pandemic prompted educators to revisit and adjust their understanding and approach to navigate the complexities of this new teaching context. While educational policies and directives are intended to drive change at the school level, they are subject to reinterpretation and adaptation as they interact with educators and the context of each school. Consequently, the findings of this study emphasize the importance of involving teachers in the development of educational policies, directives, and reform efforts. Such involvement would provide valuable insights and highlight the complexities involved in policy enactment, ultimately bridging the gap between policy as text and policy in practice.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,007 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».