Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Purple Wartyback is a long-lived (maximum age > 90 years) freshwater mussel (Unionidae). Age-at-maturity is estimated to be 6-10 years and generation time at 26 years in Canada. The current distribution of Purple Wartyback in Canada is limited to three rivers in southwestern Ontario, including the Ausable River (Lake Huron drainage), and the Sydenham and Thames rivers (Lake St. Clair drainage). Populations in the Sydenham and Thames rivers are showing positive population growth while the Ausable River is likely stable. It is extirpated from the Detroit River and Lake Erie around Pelee Island. In Canada, Purple Wartyback occupies medium to large rivers. Occurrence is associated with a range of habitat conditions including variable substrate types, depth, and water velocity. Purple Wartyback glochidia must encyst on the gills of an appropriate host fish to survive and metamorphose. The potential host fishes for Purple Wartyback in Canada include Black and Yellow bullheads (Ameiurus melas, A. natalis), Channel Catfish (Ictalurus punctatus) and possibly Flathead Catfish (Pylodictis olivaris). This is based on laboratory infestations in the United States (as infestation experiments have not occurred with Canadian Purple Wartyback), and distributional overlap of known ranges in Canadian waters. To achieve ~99% probability of persistence over 250 years requires ~2,800 (CI: 1,900- 4,000) adult Purple Wartyback. A minimum of 623.3 m2 (CI: 251.9-1,396.9) and 2,900 m2 (CI: 301.5-17,166.3) of suitable habitat in the Sydenham and Thames rivers, respectively, is required to support a minimum viable population (MVP); there is sufficient habitat available in both rivers. The spatial configuration of populations and habitat is important and has not been considered. Population projections were completed for the quadrat-sampled area of the Sydenham, Thames, and Ausable rivers. Estimated abundance in the sampled habitats in the Sydenham River exceeded the estimated MVP upper confidence interval. Positive population growth rates were estimated in the Sydenham and Thames rivers, and the size distribution of Purple Wartyback suggests successful recruitment is occurring in both systems. The Ausable River populations have not exhibited positive population growth and remain at low density. Results are considered conservative because quadrat surveys have not been completed across all occupied habitat, and a substantial amount of habitat has not been surveyed. Purple Wartyback populations are generally most sensitive to perturbations in adult survival; however, they become more sensitive to perturbations to juvenile survival when experiencing significant population growth. Uncertainty in age-at-maturity and the proportion of reproduction that occurs later in life (relative fertility) affect how sensitive populations are to perturbations in adult and juvenile survival. Dreissenid mussels are the cause of extirpation of Purple Wartyback from the Detroit River and Lake Erie around Pelee Island. The greatest threats to extant populations are pollution from agricultural and urban sources, and road runoff; extreme weather events associated with climate change; aquatic invasive species (dreissenid mussels and Round Goby Neogobius melanostomus); and bridge or culvert construction/maintenance works. Key knowledge gaps remain regarding vital rates, glochidia-host relationships, and threat mechanisms, magnitude of impact, and interactions. Knowledge gaps resulting in uncertainties related to how Purple Wartyback will respond to threats and recovery actions should be addressed with additional research.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,074 | 0,036 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».