Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purple Wartyback is a long-lived (maximum age > 90 years) freshwater mussel (Unionidae). Age-at-maturity is estimated to be 6-10 years and generation time at 26 years in Canada. The current distribution of Purple Wartyback in Canada is limited to three rivers in southwestern Ontario, including the Ausable River (Lake Huron drainage), and the Sydenham and Thames rivers (Lake St. Clair drainage). Populations in the Sydenham and Thames rivers are showing positive population growth while the Ausable River is likely stable. It is extirpated from the Detroit River and Lake Erie around Pelee Island. In Canada, Purple Wartyback occupies medium to large rivers. Occurrence is associated with a range of habitat conditions including variable substrate types, depth, and water velocity. Purple Wartyback glochidia must encyst on the gills of an appropriate host fish to survive and metamorphose. The potential host fishes for Purple Wartyback in Canada include Black and Yellow bullheads (Ameiurus melas, A. natalis), Channel Catfish (Ictalurus punctatus) and possibly Flathead Catfish (Pylodictis olivaris). This is based on laboratory infestations in the United States (as infestation experiments have not occurred with Canadian Purple Wartyback), and distributional overlap of known ranges in Canadian waters. To achieve ~99% probability of persistence over 250 years requires ~2,800 (CI: 1,900- 4,000) adult Purple Wartyback. A minimum of 623.3 m2 (CI: 251.9-1,396.9) and 2,900 m2 (CI: 301.5-17,166.3) of suitable habitat in the Sydenham and Thames rivers, respectively, is required to support a minimum viable population (MVP); there is sufficient habitat available in both rivers. The spatial configuration of populations and habitat is important and has not been considered. Population projections were completed for the quadrat-sampled area of the Sydenham, Thames, and Ausable rivers. Estimated abundance in the sampled habitats in the Sydenham River exceeded the estimated MVP upper confidence interval. Positive population growth rates were estimated in the Sydenham and Thames rivers, and the size distribution of Purple Wartyback suggests successful recruitment is occurring in both systems. The Ausable River populations have not exhibited positive population growth and remain at low density. Results are considered conservative because quadrat surveys have not been completed across all occupied habitat, and a substantial amount of habitat has not been surveyed. Purple Wartyback populations are generally most sensitive to perturbations in adult survival; however, they become more sensitive to perturbations to juvenile survival when experiencing significant population growth. Uncertainty in age-at-maturity and the proportion of reproduction that occurs later in life (relative fertility) affect how sensitive populations are to perturbations in adult and juvenile survival. Dreissenid mussels are the cause of extirpation of Purple Wartyback from the Detroit River and Lake Erie around Pelee Island. The greatest threats to extant populations are pollution from agricultural and urban sources, and road runoff; extreme weather events associated with climate change; aquatic invasive species (dreissenid mussels and Round Goby Neogobius melanostomus); and bridge or culvert construction/maintenance works. Key knowledge gaps remain regarding vital rates, glochidia-host relationships, and threat mechanisms, magnitude of impact, and interactions. Knowledge gaps resulting in uncertainties related to how Purple Wartyback will respond to threats and recovery actions should be addressed with additional research.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.074 | 0.036 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".