CRIMINAL LIABILITY FOR LEAVING IN DANGER UNDER CANADIAN LAW: ANALYSIS AND POSITIVE EXPERIENCE FOR UKRAINE IN THE FIELD OF COMBATING CRIMINAL OFFENSES AGAINST THE LIFE AND HEALTH OF A PERSON
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The article examines criminal liability under Canadian law for abandonment in danger (Article 215 of the Criminal Code of Canada), i.e. failure to fulfill the duties of care by certain persons (parents, adoptive parents before the child reaches the age of 16, guardians, spouses, etc.), if the victim, due to his/her minority, old age, illness or other helpless condition, is unable to provide himself/herself with a full and safe life. Attention is also paid to highlighting the elements of the criminal offense, as well as the punishment for its commission. Based on the analysis, it is proposed to supplement Part 1 of Article 135 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine with not only a life-threatening but also a health-threatening condition, and therefore the disposition of Part 1 of Article 135 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine at the legislative level should be worded as follows: “deliberate abandonment without help of a person who is in a life-threatening condition and health condition and is deprived of the opportunity to take measures for self-preservation due to minor age, old age, illness or as a result of another helpless condition, if the person who abandoned without help was obliged to take care of this person and was able to provide him with assistance, as well as in the case when he himself put the victim in a life-threatening condition and health condition”, which will have a positive impact on preventing and counteracting the commission of criminal offenses against the life and health of a person, including those related to abandonment in danger. Also, during the analysis of the composition of abandonment in danger under the criminal law of Canada, it was found that this composition of the crime is formal, that is, it does not provide for the occurrence of socially dangerous consequences for the victim. Among the types of punishments applicable to a person guilty of leaving a person in danger, the criminal law of Canada provides for imprisonment for a term of up to five years. The presence of such a type of punishment as imprisonment for leaving a person in danger under the legislation of Ukraine is also appropriate and logically justified, since this criminal offense is committed against the life and health of a person and can cause socially dangerous consequences to him.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,010 | 0,024 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».