CRIMINAL LIABILITY FOR LEAVING IN DANGER UNDER CANADIAN LAW: ANALYSIS AND POSITIVE EXPERIENCE FOR UKRAINE IN THE FIELD OF COMBATING CRIMINAL OFFENSES AGAINST THE LIFE AND HEALTH OF A PERSON
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article examines criminal liability under Canadian law for abandonment in danger (Article 215 of the Criminal Code of Canada), i.e. failure to fulfill the duties of care by certain persons (parents, adoptive parents before the child reaches the age of 16, guardians, spouses, etc.), if the victim, due to his/her minority, old age, illness or other helpless condition, is unable to provide himself/herself with a full and safe life. Attention is also paid to highlighting the elements of the criminal offense, as well as the punishment for its commission. Based on the analysis, it is proposed to supplement Part 1 of Article 135 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine with not only a life-threatening but also a health-threatening condition, and therefore the disposition of Part 1 of Article 135 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine at the legislative level should be worded as follows: “deliberate abandonment without help of a person who is in a life-threatening condition and health condition and is deprived of the opportunity to take measures for self-preservation due to minor age, old age, illness or as a result of another helpless condition, if the person who abandoned without help was obliged to take care of this person and was able to provide him with assistance, as well as in the case when he himself put the victim in a life-threatening condition and health condition”, which will have a positive impact on preventing and counteracting the commission of criminal offenses against the life and health of a person, including those related to abandonment in danger. Also, during the analysis of the composition of abandonment in danger under the criminal law of Canada, it was found that this composition of the crime is formal, that is, it does not provide for the occurrence of socially dangerous consequences for the victim. Among the types of punishments applicable to a person guilty of leaving a person in danger, the criminal law of Canada provides for imprisonment for a term of up to five years. The presence of such a type of punishment as imprisonment for leaving a person in danger under the legislation of Ukraine is also appropriate and logically justified, since this criminal offense is committed against the life and health of a person and can cause socially dangerous consequences to him.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.024 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".