Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Excavations by archaeologists have taken place at Charlie Lake Cave on a number of occasions.There is also evidence for twentieth century non-archaeological disturbance in the form of relatively shallow features near the surface which contain artifacts of metal, glass and plastic, and in physical and verbal evidence that the deposits within the cave itself have been extensively disturbed by children.The site has seen five seasons of archaeological work prior to 2022.In 1974 the site was recorded by archaeologists, and Knut Fladmark, Sharon Fladmark and Richard Gilbert (all from SFU) excavated a 1 by 0.5 metre test pit in front of the cave mouth.This excavation occupies roughly the east half of unit 6.A month later, a similar sized test pit was excavated adjacent to the first test pit, forming roughly the west half of unit 6.Both test pits penetrated about 1.3 metres of sediments.This second excavation was undertaken by Richard Gilbert, Jim Burns (vertebrate paleontologist who worked on cave sites in Alberta) and Alan Bryan (Professor, University of Alberta, where Gilbert had gone to start a masters degree).A radiocarbon date of about 1800 BP (uncalibrated) was obtained from the base of this excavation unit (lab number and full information currently unknown).In 1983 Knut Fladmark returned to the site with a larger crew, funded through a SSHRC grant.Excavations were undertaken in a series of 1 by 1 metre units designed to sample the deposits in the cave and in the gully.These excavations resulted in the discovery of the Paleoindian component at the site, as well as a long sequence of later cultural and faunal components.Fladmark oriented a 1 by 1 metre grid over the site such that the east-west axis ran roughly parallel to the gully.As a result, grid north is oriented roughly northeast.Grid lines running east-west were defined as "north" lines, and grid lines running north-south were defined as "east" lines.All units were defined in field notes using the grid line system.Thus, the most westerly unit excavated in 1983 was "N20-21 E20-21".During the analysis which followed the 1983 season each excavation unit was assigned a simple number (e.g."unit 4" replaced "N21-22 E20-21"), which reduced cataloguing time and reduced the chance of making mistakes in unit designations.A few potential areas of confusion should be noted.First, field notes taken in 1983 refer both to the "test pit" or "test pit 1" when discussing the two small contiguous excavation units excavated in 1974.The 1983 grid was oriented slightly differently from the earlier test pits.However, most of the 1974 test pits were contained within unit 6 (N21-22 E23-24).Before unit 6 was excavated in 1983, the backdirt that filled the old 1974 test pit was cleaned out, and further excavation more than doubled its original depth.Secondly, one should note that during the analysis of artifacts and bones from the 1983 season this same unit (N21-22 E23-24) was initially defined as unit 15, and was subsequently changed to unit 6.Some of the original records from the 1983 season may still make reference to unit 15.Thirdly, in 1983 a
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,009 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,007 | 0,008 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,011 | 0,004 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,005 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,044 | 0,010 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».