Bibliographic record
Abstract
Excavations by archaeologists have taken place at Charlie Lake Cave on a number of occasions.There is also evidence for twentieth century non-archaeological disturbance in the form of relatively shallow features near the surface which contain artifacts of metal, glass and plastic, and in physical and verbal evidence that the deposits within the cave itself have been extensively disturbed by children.The site has seen five seasons of archaeological work prior to 2022.In 1974 the site was recorded by archaeologists, and Knut Fladmark, Sharon Fladmark and Richard Gilbert (all from SFU) excavated a 1 by 0.5 metre test pit in front of the cave mouth.This excavation occupies roughly the east half of unit 6.A month later, a similar sized test pit was excavated adjacent to the first test pit, forming roughly the west half of unit 6.Both test pits penetrated about 1.3 metres of sediments.This second excavation was undertaken by Richard Gilbert, Jim Burns (vertebrate paleontologist who worked on cave sites in Alberta) and Alan Bryan (Professor, University of Alberta, where Gilbert had gone to start a masters degree).A radiocarbon date of about 1800 BP (uncalibrated) was obtained from the base of this excavation unit (lab number and full information currently unknown).In 1983 Knut Fladmark returned to the site with a larger crew, funded through a SSHRC grant.Excavations were undertaken in a series of 1 by 1 metre units designed to sample the deposits in the cave and in the gully.These excavations resulted in the discovery of the Paleoindian component at the site, as well as a long sequence of later cultural and faunal components.Fladmark oriented a 1 by 1 metre grid over the site such that the east-west axis ran roughly parallel to the gully.As a result, grid north is oriented roughly northeast.Grid lines running east-west were defined as "north" lines, and grid lines running north-south were defined as "east" lines.All units were defined in field notes using the grid line system.Thus, the most westerly unit excavated in 1983 was "N20-21 E20-21".During the analysis which followed the 1983 season each excavation unit was assigned a simple number (e.g."unit 4" replaced "N21-22 E20-21"), which reduced cataloguing time and reduced the chance of making mistakes in unit designations.A few potential areas of confusion should be noted.First, field notes taken in 1983 refer both to the "test pit" or "test pit 1" when discussing the two small contiguous excavation units excavated in 1974.The 1983 grid was oriented slightly differently from the earlier test pits.However, most of the 1974 test pits were contained within unit 6 (N21-22 E23-24).Before unit 6 was excavated in 1983, the backdirt that filled the old 1974 test pit was cleaned out, and further excavation more than doubled its original depth.Secondly, one should note that during the analysis of artifacts and bones from the 1983 season this same unit (N21-22 E23-24) was initially defined as unit 15, and was subsequently changed to unit 6.Some of the original records from the 1983 season may still make reference to unit 15.Thirdly, in 1983 a
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.044 | 0.010 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".