Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Harrier radio-tagging techniques and local and migratory movements of radio-tagged juvenile Harriers.A.E. Beske.1980.Raptor Res.14:126-127.{Abstract of thesis: compares reactions of Northern Harriers to 3 methods of attaching radios, summarizes local and migratory movements, and documents the establishment of temporary home ranges during migration.}MM Identification, molts, and plumages Some anatomic characteristics of southeastern Michigan Canada Geese.R.M. Kaminski.1980.]ac/•-Pine Warbler 58:99-103.(Several morphological parameters were found to be imprecise predictors of Canada Goose age-sex classes.)NC Banding history Bird banding in Canada.Anonymous.1981.Can.Wildl.Serv., Ottawa.8 pp.pamphlet.{Brief review of history, purpose, techniques and level of effort of banding in Canada in particular and North America in general.)MM Banding equipment and techniques A study of weight loss from aluminum rings taken from birds occupying either a dry land or fresh water habitats.D. Whitelaw.1979.Salting News 8:57-64.{Weight loss, and thus wear, was greater on bands from birds occupying terrestrial habitats than from those on water birds.Band wear was greater in alkaline waters than in acidic waters.The longevity of some waterfowl and at least one dove species is such that some individuals may occasionally live longer than the effective life of the band, but these individuals constitute only a small proportion of the population.)MM An improved balchatri trap for Buzzards.M.B.Schmitt and S. Baur.1979.Safring News 8:65-67.{Trapping success varied with noose length and width, number of bait prey, color of trap, and length of time the observer waited for a reaction.)MM Trapping nesting terns: a modified method.].Burton and J. Chalifour.1980.Inland Bird Banding 52:36.(Modifications to a trap described earlier by McNicholl to suit conditions in the Magdellon Islands improved success in trapping nesting Arctic and Common Terns.)MM North American banding results Similarity of dispersal among sibling male Spruce Grouse.D.M. Keppie.1980.Can.J. Zool.58:2102-2104.(Variability among distances of dispersal in color-banded male grouse was less among siblings than among birds from different broods.)MM The Long-billed Curlew in Saskatchewan: status and distribution.W.E. Renaud.1980.Blue Jay 38:221-237.(Brood banded in nest moved more than 6.5 km in 6 days.)MM Protecting Whooping Cranes.H. de Vogel.1980.Blue Jay 38:266.(Pair of Whooping Cranes with color-banded chick at Unity, Sask.early in Oct. 1979 were at Aransas, TX on 5 Oct.) MM Owl banding in Saskatchewan.T. Hrynewich.1980.Blue Jay 38:266-267.(Letter from a grade 5 student indicates tremendous educational value of C. Stuart Houston's Great Horned Owl banding program) MM Gray Catbirds rear Brown-headed Cowbirds.P.E.Lowther.1980.Inland Bird Banding 52:29-30.(Four instances of Gray Catbirds raising cowbirds at least to fiedging.Three cowbirds were banded, and one of these observed for more than a week.)MM Alberta bluebird trails -1978.J.C. Finlay.1980.Alta Nat.10:149-151.(753 Mountain Bluebirds and 863 TreeSwallows were banded on Alberta trails in 1978.Several returns were reported from both species, including a swallow nesting in the same box for the fourth consecutive year.)MM Jul.--Sep.1981 North American Bird Bander Page 111 Edited by Martin K. McNicholl i Harrier radio-tagging techniques and local and migratory movements of radio-tagged juvenile Harriers.A.E. Beske.1980.Raptor Res.14:126-127.{Abstract of thesis: compares reactions of Northern Harriers to 3 methods of attaching radios, summarizes local and migratory movements, and documents the establishment of temporary home ranges during migration.}MM Identification, molts, and plumages Some anatomic characteristics of southeastern Michigan Canada Geese.R.M. Kaminski.1980.]ac/•-Pine Warbler 58:99-103.(Several morphological parameters were found to be imprecise predictors of Canada Goose age-sex classes.)NC Banding history Bird banding in Canada.Anonymous.1981.Can.Wildl.Serv., Ottawa.8 pp.pamphlet.{Brief review of history, purpose, techniques and level of effort of banding in Canada in particular and North America in general.)MM Banding equipment and techniques A study of weight loss from aluminum rings taken from birds occupying either a dry land or fresh water habitats.D. Whitelaw.1979.Salting News 8:57-64.{Weight loss, and thus wear, was greater on bands from birds occupying terrestrial habitats than from those on water birds.Band wear was greater in alkaline waters than in acidic waters.The longevity of some waterfowl and at least one dove species is such that some individuals may occasionally live longer than the effective life of the band, but these individuals constitute only a small proportion of the population.)MM An improved balchatri trap for Buzzards.M.B.Schmitt and S. Baur.1979.Safring News 8:65-67.{Trapping success varied with noose length and width, number of bait prey, color of trap, and length of time the observer waited for a reaction.)MM Trapping nesting terns: a modified method.].Burton and J. Chalifour.1980.Inland Bird Banding 52:36.(Modifications to a trap described earlier by McNicholl to suit conditions in the Magdellon Islands improved success in trapping nesting Arctic and Common Terns.)MM North American banding results Similarity of dispersal among sibling male Spruce Grouse.D.M. Keppie.1980.Can.J. Zool.58:2102-2104.(Variability among distances of dispersal in color-banded male grouse was less among siblings than among birds from different broods.)MM The Long-billed Curlew in Saskatchewan: status and distribution.W.E. Renaud.1980.Blue Jay 38:221-237.(Brood banded in nest moved more than 6.5 km in 6 days.)MM Protecting Whooping Cranes.H. de Vogel.1980.Blue Jay 38:266.(Pair of Whooping Cranes with color-banded chick at Unity, Sask.early in Oct. 1979 were at Aransas, TX on 5 Oct.) MM Owl banding in Saskatchewan.T. Hrynewich.1980.Blue Jay 38:266-267.(Letter from a grade 5 student indicates tremendous educational value of C. Stuart Houston's Great Horned Owl banding program) MM Gray Catbirds rear Brown-headed Cowbirds.P.E.Lowther.1980.Inland Bird Banding 52:29-30.(Four instances of Gray Catbirds raising cowbirds at least to fiedging.Three cowbirds were banded, and one of these observed for more than a week.)MM Alberta bluebird trails -1978.J.C. Finlay.1980.Alta Nat.10:149-151.(753 Mountain Bluebirds and 863 Tree Swallows were banded on Alberta trails in 1978.Several returns were reported from both species, including a swallow nesting in the same box for the fourth consecutive year.)MM
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,012 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,009 | 0,013 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,006 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,309 | 0,132 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; l’étiquette directe de Gemma et le classifieur distillé Codex s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».