Bibliographic record
Abstract
Harrier radio-tagging techniques and local and migratory movements of radio-tagged juvenile Harriers.A.E. Beske.1980.Raptor Res.14:126-127.{Abstract of thesis: compares reactions of Northern Harriers to 3 methods of attaching radios, summarizes local and migratory movements, and documents the establishment of temporary home ranges during migration.}MM Identification, molts, and plumages Some anatomic characteristics of southeastern Michigan Canada Geese.R.M. Kaminski.1980.]ac/•-Pine Warbler 58:99-103.(Several morphological parameters were found to be imprecise predictors of Canada Goose age-sex classes.)NC Banding history Bird banding in Canada.Anonymous.1981.Can.Wildl.Serv., Ottawa.8 pp.pamphlet.{Brief review of history, purpose, techniques and level of effort of banding in Canada in particular and North America in general.)MM Banding equipment and techniques A study of weight loss from aluminum rings taken from birds occupying either a dry land or fresh water habitats.D. Whitelaw.1979.Salting News 8:57-64.{Weight loss, and thus wear, was greater on bands from birds occupying terrestrial habitats than from those on water birds.Band wear was greater in alkaline waters than in acidic waters.The longevity of some waterfowl and at least one dove species is such that some individuals may occasionally live longer than the effective life of the band, but these individuals constitute only a small proportion of the population.)MM An improved balchatri trap for Buzzards.M.B.Schmitt and S. Baur.1979.Safring News 8:65-67.{Trapping success varied with noose length and width, number of bait prey, color of trap, and length of time the observer waited for a reaction.)MM Trapping nesting terns: a modified method.].Burton and J. Chalifour.1980.Inland Bird Banding 52:36.(Modifications to a trap described earlier by McNicholl to suit conditions in the Magdellon Islands improved success in trapping nesting Arctic and Common Terns.)MM North American banding results Similarity of dispersal among sibling male Spruce Grouse.D.M. Keppie.1980.Can.J. Zool.58:2102-2104.(Variability among distances of dispersal in color-banded male grouse was less among siblings than among birds from different broods.)MM The Long-billed Curlew in Saskatchewan: status and distribution.W.E. Renaud.1980.Blue Jay 38:221-237.(Brood banded in nest moved more than 6.5 km in 6 days.)MM Protecting Whooping Cranes.H. de Vogel.1980.Blue Jay 38:266.(Pair of Whooping Cranes with color-banded chick at Unity, Sask.early in Oct. 1979 were at Aransas, TX on 5 Oct.) MM Owl banding in Saskatchewan.T. Hrynewich.1980.Blue Jay 38:266-267.(Letter from a grade 5 student indicates tremendous educational value of C. Stuart Houston's Great Horned Owl banding program) MM Gray Catbirds rear Brown-headed Cowbirds.P.E.Lowther.1980.Inland Bird Banding 52:29-30.(Four instances of Gray Catbirds raising cowbirds at least to fiedging.Three cowbirds were banded, and one of these observed for more than a week.)MM Alberta bluebird trails -1978.J.C. Finlay.1980.Alta Nat.10:149-151.(753 Mountain Bluebirds and 863 TreeSwallows were banded on Alberta trails in 1978.Several returns were reported from both species, including a swallow nesting in the same box for the fourth consecutive year.)MM Jul.--Sep.1981 North American Bird Bander Page 111 Edited by Martin K. McNicholl i Harrier radio-tagging techniques and local and migratory movements of radio-tagged juvenile Harriers.A.E. Beske.1980.Raptor Res.14:126-127.{Abstract of thesis: compares reactions of Northern Harriers to 3 methods of attaching radios, summarizes local and migratory movements, and documents the establishment of temporary home ranges during migration.}MM Identification, molts, and plumages Some anatomic characteristics of southeastern Michigan Canada Geese.R.M. Kaminski.1980.]ac/•-Pine Warbler 58:99-103.(Several morphological parameters were found to be imprecise predictors of Canada Goose age-sex classes.)NC Banding history Bird banding in Canada.Anonymous.1981.Can.Wildl.Serv., Ottawa.8 pp.pamphlet.{Brief review of history, purpose, techniques and level of effort of banding in Canada in particular and North America in general.)MM Banding equipment and techniques A study of weight loss from aluminum rings taken from birds occupying either a dry land or fresh water habitats.D. Whitelaw.1979.Salting News 8:57-64.{Weight loss, and thus wear, was greater on bands from birds occupying terrestrial habitats than from those on water birds.Band wear was greater in alkaline waters than in acidic waters.The longevity of some waterfowl and at least one dove species is such that some individuals may occasionally live longer than the effective life of the band, but these individuals constitute only a small proportion of the population.)MM An improved balchatri trap for Buzzards.M.B.Schmitt and S. Baur.1979.Safring News 8:65-67.{Trapping success varied with noose length and width, number of bait prey, color of trap, and length of time the observer waited for a reaction.)MM Trapping nesting terns: a modified method.].Burton and J. Chalifour.1980.Inland Bird Banding 52:36.(Modifications to a trap described earlier by McNicholl to suit conditions in the Magdellon Islands improved success in trapping nesting Arctic and Common Terns.)MM North American banding results Similarity of dispersal among sibling male Spruce Grouse.D.M. Keppie.1980.Can.J. Zool.58:2102-2104.(Variability among distances of dispersal in color-banded male grouse was less among siblings than among birds from different broods.)MM The Long-billed Curlew in Saskatchewan: status and distribution.W.E. Renaud.1980.Blue Jay 38:221-237.(Brood banded in nest moved more than 6.5 km in 6 days.)MM Protecting Whooping Cranes.H. de Vogel.1980.Blue Jay 38:266.(Pair of Whooping Cranes with color-banded chick at Unity, Sask.early in Oct. 1979 were at Aransas, TX on 5 Oct.) MM Owl banding in Saskatchewan.T. Hrynewich.1980.Blue Jay 38:266-267.(Letter from a grade 5 student indicates tremendous educational value of C. Stuart Houston's Great Horned Owl banding program) MM Gray Catbirds rear Brown-headed Cowbirds.P.E.Lowther.1980.Inland Bird Banding 52:29-30.(Four instances of Gray Catbirds raising cowbirds at least to fiedging.Three cowbirds were banded, and one of these observed for more than a week.)MM Alberta bluebird trails -1978.J.C. Finlay.1980.Alta Nat.10:149-151.(753 Mountain Bluebirds and 863 Tree Swallows were banded on Alberta trails in 1978.Several returns were reported from both species, including a swallow nesting in the same box for the fourth consecutive year.)MM
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.009 | 0.013 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.309 | 0.132 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".