360° Contextual Simulation Video for Undergraduate Nursing Students: An Electroencephalography-Based Quasi-Experimental Study (Preprint)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Screen-based 360° contextual simulation videos are increasingly being used in nursing education; however, evidence regarding their effects on learning outcomes and neural electroencephalography (EEG) patterns remains limited. Objective: This study aims to evaluate whether integrating 360° contextual simulation videos with traditional classroom instruction influences nursing students' perceptions of simulation design and educational practices, their levels of satisfaction and self-confidence in learning, and EEG-based neural correlates of action observation. Methods: In a quasi-experiment, 55 third-year nursing students (experimental n=28; control n=27) were assigned to 360° contextual simulation video learning (laptop; no head-mounted display) or traditional classroom-based instruction (didactic instruction, guided discussion, and 2D instructional videos). The primary outcomes were Simulation Design Scale (SDS) and Educational Practices Questionnaire (EPQ) scores. Secondary outcomes included Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning Scale (SCLS) scores and EEG indices (power at C3, Cz, and C4; μ-rhythm suppression scores). Group differences were tested with 2-tailed t tests and analysis of covariance adjusted for baseline values. Results: Between-group analyses (analysis of covariance adjusted for baseline values) revealed higher posttest scores on the SDS (F1,35=7.80, η²=.182; P=.008), EPQ (F1,35=6.00, η²=.146; P=.02), and SCLS (F1,35=7.01, η²=.167; P=.01) in the experimental group compared to the control group. Within-group analyses (paired t tests) indicated significant increases in SDS and EPQ scores for the experimental group (P<.001 and P=.005), whereas the control group showed a decrease in the SDS score (P=.001) and no significant change in the EPQ score (P=.11). The SCLS score did not significantly change in the experimental group (P=.21) but increased in the control group (P=.04). EEG analyses revealed significant postexposure reductions in power at C3, Cz, and C4 for the experimental group (all P<.001), with between-group effects at Cz (F1,35=425.29, η²=.926; P<.001) and C4 (F1,35=5.45, η²=.138; P=.03). μ-Suppression, which is an indirect EEG correlate that is often reported during action observation, was greater in the experimental group at Cz (P=.03) and C4 (P=.03) but not at C3 (P=.13). No adverse events were reported. Conclusions: Integrating 360° contextual simulation videos into undergraduate nursing education was associated with higher SDS and EPQ scores and improved self-reported satisfaction and self-confidence, in addition to EEG-based findings that may reflect neural EEG patterns associated with action observation. Larger multisite randomized trials are warranted to confirm efficacy and cost-effectiveness.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».