CRT2 S3 Ep2: Eminent Domain: Discriminatory Land Takings and the Fight for Reparations
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This episode of CRT2 takes a look at eminent domain under the Fifth Amendment “Takings Clause,” and the way it has been used to disproportionately displace Black and other racialized communities in the name of urban renewal and “public use.” Indeed, the displacement of Black communities in particular was so synonymous with “urban renewal” in the United States that it was regularly referred to as “Negro removal.” We see the prevalence of this trend in cases across the country, in Baltimore, Los Angeles, Minneapolis, and New York, just to name a few. The land is declared “blighted” and seized under the power of eminent domain to make way for various urban planning projects. In New York City for example, the Lincoln Center and surrounding area was once known as San Juan Hill, a thriving community consisting largely of African American, Afro-Caribbean, and Puerto Rican residents. It was famous for its bustling jazz clubs and dance halls, and was the birthplace of the Charleston, bebop, and famous musicians like Thelonious Monk and James P. Johnson. An area of Central Park was once known as Seneca Village — another thriving community — founded by free African Americans in 1855. Many of its African American residents owned property, which granted them a right to vote at the time. The land was seized to create Central Park. In more recent times, land was seized through eminent domain to make way for expanding the Columbia University campus into the West Harlem Manhattanville neighbourhood. One unique aspect of this taking, however, is the Community Benefits Agreement that Columbia entered into with the West Harlem Development Corporation in 2009. Nevertheless, we have seen some progress toward justice for these communities and what reparations might look like. Bruce’s Beach was seized from Willa and Charles Bruce under the power of eminent domain exercised by a local Southern California government in 1924. It was a beachfront property along the Southern California coast, where they operated a flourishing beach resort for Black families — it was one of the few places where Black people could have access to a beach. In 2021, almost 100 years after the taking, the property was approved to be returned back to the Bruce family. In this episode, we talk to Kavon Ward, the founder of Where is My Land about her ground-breaking work surrounding the return of Bruce’s Beach, and the road to reparations for these communities who had land stolen from them. We also talk to Professor Flores Forbes, an urban planner and adjunct professor at Columbia Law School, and his work in relation to the Columbia University Manhattanville expansion.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,009 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,018 | 0,007 |
| Communication savante | 0,011 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,006 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,020 | 0,021 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,029 | 0,006 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».