CRT2 S3 Ep2: Eminent Domain: Discriminatory Land Takings and the Fight for Reparations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This episode of CRT2 takes a look at eminent domain under the Fifth Amendment “Takings Clause,” and the way it has been used to disproportionately displace Black and other racialized communities in the name of urban renewal and “public use.” Indeed, the displacement of Black communities in particular was so synonymous with “urban renewal” in the United States that it was regularly referred to as “Negro removal.” We see the prevalence of this trend in cases across the country, in Baltimore, Los Angeles, Minneapolis, and New York, just to name a few. The land is declared “blighted” and seized under the power of eminent domain to make way for various urban planning projects. In New York City for example, the Lincoln Center and surrounding area was once known as San Juan Hill, a thriving community consisting largely of African American, Afro-Caribbean, and Puerto Rican residents. It was famous for its bustling jazz clubs and dance halls, and was the birthplace of the Charleston, bebop, and famous musicians like Thelonious Monk and James P. Johnson. An area of Central Park was once known as Seneca Village — another thriving community — founded by free African Americans in 1855. Many of its African American residents owned property, which granted them a right to vote at the time. The land was seized to create Central Park. In more recent times, land was seized through eminent domain to make way for expanding the Columbia University campus into the West Harlem Manhattanville neighbourhood. One unique aspect of this taking, however, is the Community Benefits Agreement that Columbia entered into with the West Harlem Development Corporation in 2009. Nevertheless, we have seen some progress toward justice for these communities and what reparations might look like. Bruce’s Beach was seized from Willa and Charles Bruce under the power of eminent domain exercised by a local Southern California government in 1924. It was a beachfront property along the Southern California coast, where they operated a flourishing beach resort for Black families — it was one of the few places where Black people could have access to a beach. In 2021, almost 100 years after the taking, the property was approved to be returned back to the Bruce family. In this episode, we talk to Kavon Ward, the founder of Where is My Land about her ground-breaking work surrounding the return of Bruce’s Beach, and the road to reparations for these communities who had land stolen from them. We also talk to Professor Flores Forbes, an urban planner and adjunct professor at Columbia Law School, and his work in relation to the Columbia University Manhattanville expansion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.018 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.020 | 0.021 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.029 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".