Notice bibliographique
Résumé
interest in its deficiencies.To a certain extent, the present 'List' gives a r•sum• of the results of MacFarlane's long period of natural history work in northern Canada, and as such is a contribution of unusual interest.The numeration and nomenclature are those of the A. O. U Check-List, but through some inadvertence, a number of the water birds follow the Passeres, with no note of advice or warning that such is the case.Also, on p. 422, the heading "636.Black and White Warbler --Mniotilta varia (Linn.)" is given twice; as its second use evidently relates to that species, the preceding species is left nameless and not easily identifiable.Mr. MacFarlane's 'Notes on the Mammals,' occupying pages ]51-283, and preceded by a portrait of the author, is an especially important contribution to the mammalogy of the region, the statistical and geographical information respecting many of the fur-bearing animals being exceedingly valuable.The nomenclature of the list "has been carefully revised by the naturalists of the U.S. National Museum," and is hence fully up to date, and stamps the list as thoroughly trustworthy.Mr. Muir's portion of the work, occupying the first 150 pages, gives a vivid picture of the topographic and climatic conditions of the country traversed by the treaty expedition of 1599, of which he was a member, and contains also much historic information of fascinating interest.Mr. MacFarlane's portion of the work contains descriptions and illustrations of a number of the old Hudson Bay Company's posts, the names of which have long been household words in natural history annals --Forts Anderson, McPherson, Chipewyan, Resolution, Good Hope, etc.--J. A. A. Knights' 'The Birds of Maine.'--In a portly volume I of nearly 700 pages, Mr. Knight has given the ornithological public a useful manual of the bird fauna of the State of Maine.The analytical keys and the descriptions of the species, it is stated, are compiled and adopted from Ridgway's 'Manual' and 'Birds of North and Middle America,' Chapman's 'Handbook,' and other standard sources.The descriptions are followed by a brief summary of the distribution, including breeding and winter ranges, followed by the county records of the species, with the authorities, a list of which is given in the Introduction.The life histories are largely based on the author's own observations and experience, and vary in length, according to the species, from a half page to several pages, and relate mainly to the bird's occurrence in Maine.The nomenclature is that of the A. O. U. ChecksList and its Supplements down to the Thirteenth, the Four-• The Birds of Maine ] With Key to and Descriptions of the various [ species known to occur or to have occurred I in the State, an Account of their Distribu-I tion and Migration, showing their relative I abundance in the various Counties of the I State as well as other regions, and con-f tributions to their Life Histories I By I 0ra Willis Knight, M. S. I Member of Maine 0•Tfithological Society, Member American Chemical Society, I Member American Ornithologists' Union, Etc.I Bangor, Maine I 1908--8vo, pp.vii+693, map, and 25 half-tone plates.$3.50, express paid.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,215 | 0,068 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».