Bibliographic record
Abstract
Jinterest in its deficiencies.To a certain extent, the present 'List' gives a rsum of the results of MacFarlane's long period of natural history work in northern Canada, and as such is a contribution of unusual interest.The numeration and nomenclature are those of the A. O. U Check-List, but through some inadvertence, a number of the water birds follow the Passeres, with no note of advice or warning that such is the case.Also, on p. 422, the heading "636.Black and White Warbler --Mniotilta varia (Linn.)" is given twice; as its second use evidently relates to that species, the preceding species is left nameless and not easily identifiable.Mr. MacFarlane's 'Notes on the Mammals,' occupying pages ]51-283, and preceded by a portrait of the author, is an especially important contribution to the mammalogy of the region, the statistical and geographical information respecting many of the fur-bearing animals being exceedingly valuable.The nomenclature of the list "has been carefully revised by the naturalists of the U.S. National Museum," and is hence fully up to date, and stamps the list as thoroughly trustworthy. Mr. Muir's portion of the work, occupying the first 150 pages, gives a vivid picture of the topographic and climatic conditions of the country traversed by the treaty expedition of 1599, of which he was a member, and contains also much historic information of fascinating interest.Mr. MacFarlane's portion of the work contains descriptions and illustrations of a number of the old Hudson Bay Company's posts, the names of which have long been household words in natural history annals --Forts Anderson, McPherson, Chipewyan, Resolution, Good Hope, etc.--J. A. A. Knights' 'The Birds of Maine.'--In a portly volume I of nearly 700 pages, Mr. Knight has given the ornithological public a useful manual of the bird fauna of the State of Maine.The analytical keys and the descriptions of the species, it is stated, are compiled and adopted from Ridgway's 'Manual' and 'Birds of North and Middle America,' Chapman's 'Handbook,' and other standard sources.The descriptions are followed by a brief summary of the distribution, including breeding and winter ranges, followed by the county records of the species, with the authorities, a list of which is given in the Introduction.The life histories are largely based on the author's own observations and experience, and vary in length, according to the species, from a half page to several pages, and relate mainly to the bird's occurrence in Maine.The nomenclature is that of the A. O. U. ChecksList and its Supplements down to the Thirteenth, the Four- The Birds of Maine ] With Key to and Descriptions of the various [ species known to occur or to have occurred I in the State, an Account of their Distribu-I tion and Migration, showing their relative I abundance in the various Counties of the I State as well as other regions, and con-f tributions to their Life Histories I By I 0ra Willis Knight, M.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".