MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7153692465

Nesting and Food of the Barn Owl (tyro Alba) in Hampshire County, Massachusetts

2024· article· W7153692465 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Elizabeth M. Boyd, Joan Shriner

Notice bibliographique

RevueDigital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) · 2024
Typearticle
Langue
DomaineEnvironmental Science
ThématiqueAvian ecology and behavior
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésStarlingFlockBarn-owlBarnNesting (process)Nest (protein structural motif)
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Starlings nesting at Churchill, Manttoba.--Themost northerly point in North America, except for Greenland, where the Starling (Sturnus vulgaris) has been reported is Churchill, Manitoba, on Hudson Bay at 58 ø 45 • north latitude.The Starling was first seen here by Ralph S. Palmer in June, 1940, when he found an individual but no evidence of nesting (1941, Canadian Field-Naturalist, 55: 52).In the summer of 1952 several pairs nested successfully at Churchill.On June 8 and June 11, I watched at least four pairs feeding young.I was not able to climb to the nests, but from the calls of the young at the approach of the adults, I judged they were almost ready to leave.So when I found no Starlings near the nests on June 14, I concluded the young had left.A number of immatures were noted in a flock of about 60 Starlings seen in the vicinity by Mrs. Eva Beckett on June 24 and on several occasions thereafter.The nests were located under the conveyor, which slants upward from the base of the grain elevator to the ship-loading dock.This conveyor is completely enclosed, but the corrugated siding does not fit snugly to the supporting girders at all points.Here, between the siding and the girders at estimated heights of 60 to 70 feet, the Starlings find cavities suitable for nests.--HARoI,D MAYF•I,D, Z557 Portsmouth Ave., Toledo 13, Ohio.Nesting and Food of the Barn Owl (Tyro alba) in Hampshire County, Massachusetts.--Barn Owls were discovered breeding on the administration building of Mount Holyoke College in the summer of 1951.The four young had left the 'nest' by the second week of September.This means that the eggs had been laid early in June, since the incubation period is 30 days (Wallace, 1948) and it takes approximately two months for the nestlings to reach the stage where they are able to fly from their nesting quarters (Bagg and Eliot, 1937).From the fall of 1950 to the spring of 1951, 28 Barn Owl pellets had been collected in a nearby section of the campus and especially near an old, no-longer used schoolhouse, located directly west of the administration building.Possibly the birds had roosted there, and when the building was demolished in the spring of 1950, they sought refuge in the nearest available building.According to Campbell (1952) the pair of Barn Owls that was located in Belchertown in the summer of 1951 established the third known breeding record for western Massachusetts.However, since their eggs failed to hatch, the rearing of young owls in South Hadley constitutes the third successful breeding record for this area.The nesting site was on the front balcony of the third story, a site very similar to that described by Phillips (1951).The balcony faced west, and the portion used for the nest was approximately 8 feet by 1 foot.After the young had left the nest, it was found that the floor was covered to a depth of 15 inches with bones, fur, and fecal remains, but no whole pellets were present.This material was collected and later analyzed.Wallace (1948) noted that the female Barn Owl deliberately breaks up the regurgitated pellets to form a nest for her offspring.Although their decomposition is accelerated by rain, they may remain whole for 8 to 10 weeks (Wilson, 1938).Thus the absence of entire pellets in the nesting debris of the present study was not surprising, since it had been accumulating over a period of at least three months.The 28 Barn Owl pellets that had been previously collected were also analyzed.They were oval and black, and seven of them, after having been stored for several months, averaged 7.6 grams in weight with a range of 3 to 11 grams.Wallace (1948) recorded an average dry weight of 6.8 grams for the 254 pellets he examined.The average dimensions of the pellets were 65.6 mm. by 32.7 mm., and they ranged 42:21 1954

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,554
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,898

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0060,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,016
Tête enseignante GPT0,180
Écart entre enseignants0,164 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueDigital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida)→Même sujetAvian ecology and behavior→Travaux en français237 207→