MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7153692465

Nesting and Food of the Barn Owl (tyro Alba) in Hampshire County, Massachusetts

2024· article· W7153692465 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Elizabeth M. Boyd, Joan Shriner

Bibliographic record

VenueDigital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) · 2024
Typearticle
Language
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAvian ecology and behavior
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStarlingFlockBarn-owlBarnNesting (process)Nest (protein structural motif)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Starlings nesting at Churchill, Manttoba.--Themost northerly point in North America, except for Greenland, where the Starling (Sturnus vulgaris) has been reported is Churchill, Manitoba, on Hudson Bay at 58 ø 45 • north latitude.The Starling was first seen here by Ralph S. Palmer in June, 1940, when he found an individual but no evidence of nesting (1941, Canadian Field-Naturalist, 55: 52).In the summer of 1952 several pairs nested successfully at Churchill.On June 8 and June 11, I watched at least four pairs feeding young.I was not able to climb to the nests, but from the calls of the young at the approach of the adults, I judged they were almost ready to leave.So when I found no Starlings near the nests on June 14, I concluded the young had left.A number of immatures were noted in a flock of about 60 Starlings seen in the vicinity by Mrs. Eva Beckett on June 24 and on several occasions thereafter.The nests were located under the conveyor, which slants upward from the base of the grain elevator to the ship-loading dock.This conveyor is completely enclosed, but the corrugated siding does not fit snugly to the supporting girders at all points.Here, between the siding and the girders at estimated heights of 60 to 70 feet, the Starlings find cavities suitable for nests.--HARoI,D MAYF•I,D, Z557 Portsmouth Ave., Toledo 13, Ohio.Nesting and Food of the Barn Owl (Tyro alba) in Hampshire County, Massachusetts.--Barn Owls were discovered breeding on the administration building of Mount Holyoke College in the summer of 1951.The four young had left the 'nest' by the second week of September.This means that the eggs had been laid early in June, since the incubation period is 30 days (Wallace, 1948) and it takes approximately two months for the nestlings to reach the stage where they are able to fly from their nesting quarters (Bagg and Eliot, 1937).From the fall of 1950 to the spring of 1951, 28 Barn Owl pellets had been collected in a nearby section of the campus and especially near an old, no-longer used schoolhouse, located directly west of the administration building.Possibly the birds had roosted there, and when the building was demolished in the spring of 1950, they sought refuge in the nearest available building.According to Campbell (1952) the pair of Barn Owls that was located in Belchertown in the summer of 1951 established the third known breeding record for western Massachusetts.However, since their eggs failed to hatch, the rearing of young owls in South Hadley constitutes the third successful breeding record for this area.The nesting site was on the front balcony of the third story, a site very similar to that described by Phillips (1951).The balcony faced west, and the portion used for the nest was approximately 8 feet by 1 foot.After the young had left the nest, it was found that the floor was covered to a depth of 15 inches with bones, fur, and fecal remains, but no whole pellets were present.This material was collected and later analyzed.Wallace (1948) noted that the female Barn Owl deliberately breaks up the regurgitated pellets to form a nest for her offspring.Although their decomposition is accelerated by rain, they may remain whole for 8 to 10 weeks (Wilson, 1938).Thus the absence of entire pellets in the nesting debris of the present study was not surprising, since it had been accumulating over a period of at least three months.The 28 Barn Owl pellets that had been previously collected were also analyzed.They were oval and black, and seven of them, after having been stored for several months, averaged 7.6 grams in weight with a range of 3 to 11 grams.Wallace (1948) recorded an average dry weight of 6.8 grams for the 254 pellets he examined.The average dimensions of the pellets were 65.6 mm. by 32.7 mm., and they ranged 42:21 1954

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.554
Threshold uncertainty score0.898

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDigital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida)→Same topicAvian ecology and behavior→French-language works237,207→