Practice 3 Etuaptmumk: Embracing Two-Eyed Seeing
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Etuaptmumk or Two-Eyed Seeing is a traditional way of knowing of the Mi’kmaq Peoples offered through the wisdom of Mi’kmaq Elders and Knowledge Keepers, Elder Dr. Albert Marshall and Elder Dr. Murdena Marshall. Elder Albert Marshall describes Etuaptmumk as the Mi’kmaw concept of the “gift of multiple perspectives,” which involves acknowledging, valuing equally, and learning from the strengths of both Indigenous and eurowestern ways of knowing to bridge worldviews. The authors position Etuaptmumk as a foundation for opening our hearts and minds to exploring health and healing through multiple lenses. It offers a way of looking at each element of the counselling process through the lens of Indigenous worldviews alongside the established eurowestern, individualist viewpoint. Practicing Etuaptmumk invites a both/and rather than either/or perspective that has the potential to enhance healthcare experiences and outcomes for all people and peoples by providing a framework for effectively and ethically navigating one’s own worldview, the worldviews of clients, and the conventional eurowestern worldview of counselling and psychology. The authors embrace epistemological pluralism to further amplify the importance of honouring the integrity of Indigenous worldviews. Pluralism builds on the foundations of Practice 1 Positionality by grounding ways of knowing, doing, and being in the particular cultural identities and relationalities of each person, Nation, or cultural community. A pluralist approach is only possible when the epistemological, ontological, and axiological positioning of both people or both communities or both worldviews is positioned as equally valid and relevant to health and healing. Melissa and Sandra value the unique contributions of the co-authors in this chapter: ● Elder Albert Marshall opens the chapter with a Teaching: Etuaptmumk takes the best from the eurocentric system or western science and the best ways of knowing and being that come from our cultures, Ceremonies, and languages. Putting those best ways of knowing together ensures that the outcome will benefit all of humanity as well our nonhuman relatives, as well as our source of life. ● Darlene Denis-Friske shares two reflections speaking first to togetherness without the loss of separateness. If we enter the space of decolonizing health, healing, and care in a spirit of pluralism, the ethical space created allows us to consider different worldviews without agreements or pressure to replace our own. Instead we represent ourselves authentically, and we hope to be heard bidirectionally (or multidirectionally). Then she speaks to the importance of ensuring Indigenous Knowledges are lifted up through Indigenous voices, perspectives, paradigms, protocols, and research methodologies, rather than lifted out. ● Fyre Jean Graveline speaks to Etuaptmumk by drawing on the Métis Sash, a woven belt of many colours. She/they invite us to share affinities and differences, as we acknowledge and weave common threads as a whole. ● Mahdi Qasqas draws on the metaphor of date palm and cedar tree roots holding hands (Etuaptmumk) as he reflects on a personal story and considers how Indigenous and Islamic lived experiences and paradigms might come together.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,007 | 0,014 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,007 | 0,008 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,006 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,014 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,005 | 0,006 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,027 | 0,007 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».