"Який то звір нехай буде од мене, слуги вашої милості, ласкаве прийнятий". З історії мисливського промислу в Гетьманщині кінця XVII століття
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background. Hunting occupied an important place in the economies and socio-cultural life of pre-modern societies. Hunting and hunting culture in the Cossack Hetmanate were replicas of those traditions and practices that were formed within the framework of the cultural model of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. If trapping was traditionally an independent segment of the economy that provided food rations with additional products, then hunting was to a greater extent a courtly entertainment of the nobility that emphasized their social status and material capabilities. Methods. The research is based on the cataloging of all references to hunting, which are contained in the correspondence of Cossack and Mercenary Officials with Hetmans of the last quarter of the 17th century. The collected material is divided into thematic blocks (seasonality, hunting tools, etc.) and each of them is analyzed. The textological method in the analysis of correspondence shows the social symbolism of hunting and hunting gifts. Results. The article presents a reconstruction of the hunting activities of Hetman’s mercenaries (kompanijci), which played a supporting role in their welfare and at the same time were training military practices. The range and seasonality of hunting coincided with the forest-steppe strip of the Dnieper region, where the kompanijci carried out their duty to guard the borders. The main objects of hunting were the so-called "red beast" - boar, moose, wolves, foxes. In addition to hunting, the mercenaries also practiced fishing, which supplied valuable products of the Dnieper ichthyofauna - sturgeon, pike, zander, and caviar. Meat and fur of wild animals, which were the object of hunting, had a high status of "knightly" products in the kitchen and everyday life of the Hetmanate. In the correspondence of mercenary officers with the commanders of mercenary regiments, hunting and hunting trophies were important as a way of obtaining status gifts, which representatives of the Cossack nobility exchanged among themselves. Disussion and conclusions. The exchange of hunting gifts marked a complex system of patronage and client networks that formed in the Hetmanate in the end of the 17th century. They reached the lowest floors of the officials hierarchy, whose members were the organizers of hunting sessions, and ended with hetmans, colonels and church hierarchs, as recipients of status gifts. The model of hunting industries based on the our reconstruction allows to extrapolate it to the functioning of hunting and the practices of exchanging hunting trophies as status gifts, and to other regions of the Cossack Hetmanate. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2640.2023.156.6
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,005 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,014 | 0,031 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle