MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7159554628

"Який то звір нехай буде од мене, слуги вашої милості, ласкаве прийнятий". З історії мисливського промислу в Гетьманщині кінця XVII століття

2023· article· uk· W7159554628 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueeKNUTSHIR · 2023
Typearticle
Languageuk
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical and Cultural Studies of Poland
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNobilityQuarter (Canadian coin)Guard (computer science)WelfareSocial lifeDuty
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background. Hunting occupied an important place in the economies and socio-cultural life of pre-modern societies. Hunting and hunting culture in the Cossack Hetmanate were replicas of those traditions and practices that were formed within the framework of the cultural model of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. If trapping was traditionally an independent segment of the economy that provided food rations with additional products, then hunting was to a greater extent a courtly entertainment of the nobility that emphasized their social status and material capabilities. Methods. The research is based on the cataloging of all references to hunting, which are contained in the correspondence of Cossack and Mercenary Officials with Hetmans of the last quarter of the 17th century. The collected material is divided into thematic blocks (seasonality, hunting tools, etc.) and each of them is analyzed. The textological method in the analysis of correspondence shows the social symbolism of hunting and hunting gifts. Results. The article presents a reconstruction of the hunting activities of Hetman’s mercenaries (kompanijci), which played a supporting role in their welfare and at the same time were training military practices. The range and seasonality of hunting coincided with the forest-steppe strip of the Dnieper region, where the kompanijci carried out their duty to guard the borders. The main objects of hunting were the so-called "red beast" - boar, moose, wolves, foxes. In addition to hunting, the mercenaries also practiced fishing, which supplied valuable products of the Dnieper ichthyofauna - sturgeon, pike, zander, and caviar. Meat and fur of wild animals, which were the object of hunting, had a high status of "knightly" products in the kitchen and everyday life of the Hetmanate. In the correspondence of mercenary officers with the commanders of mercenary regiments, hunting and hunting trophies were important as a way of obtaining status gifts, which representatives of the Cossack nobility exchanged among themselves. Disussion and conclusions. The exchange of hunting gifts marked a complex system of patronage and client networks that formed in the Hetmanate in the end of the 17th century. They reached the lowest floors of the officials hierarchy, whose members were the organizers of hunting sessions, and ended with hetmans, colonels and church hierarchs, as recipients of status gifts. The model of hunting industries based on the our reconstruction allows to extrapolate it to the functioning of hunting and the practices of exchanging hunting trophies as status gifts, and to other regions of the Cossack Hetmanate. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2640.2023.156.6

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.261
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.031

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it