MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7161727875 · doi:10.59236/emro.v27i7a353

Negra

2025· article· W7161727875 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
LaRoi Lawton

Notice bibliographique

RevueEducational Media Reviews Online · 2025
Typearticle
Langue
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueLatin American and Latino Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésResistance (ecology)RacismEthnic groupBeautyInvisibilitySpace (punctuation)Race (biology)Intersection (aeronautics)

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Distributed by Terra Nostra FilmsProduced by Daniela Contreras, Medhin Tewolde Serrano, and Nicolas DéfosséDirected by Medhin Tewolde Serrano2020, Streaming, 72 mins Negra explores the explicit fact of racism from a Mexican viewpoint, through English subtitles, which in actuality speaks to the inherent racial discrimination within many ethnic groups today. This film introduces the viewer to five Mexican Black women who speak to their personal experience of racism, not only from friends but family members, based solely on the color of their skin, not their Mexican heritage. To be a Black woman in Mexico, through the eyes of the five women portrayed in this film, is to navigate a complex intersection of identity, history, and resistance in a country that has often denied the visibility and contributions of its Afro-descendant population. Their lived experiences reveal a layered reality marked by racism, cultural erasure, and the resilience required to reclaim space and voice. Racism, both subtle and overt, is a daily reality. These women recount how their society imposes Eurocentric beauty standards, stereotypes Blackness as foreign or inferior, and erases African heritage from national narratives. They are frequently mistaken as outsiders in their own country, forced to explain or defend their identity. Yet, amid this marginalization, resistance flourishes. These women resist by embracing and preserving Afro-Mexican traditions, by speaking out in public spaces, and by forming community networks that affirm their heritage. Through activism, art, education, and storytelling, they confront systemic injustices and demand recognition—not just for themselves, but for future generations like them. The journey also involves a profound process of self-acceptance. For many, coming into their Blackness in a society that discourages it means unlearning internalized racism and reclaiming pride in their roots. This process is often personal and politically shaped by family, community, and a growing awareness of global Black movements. Ultimately, their voices illuminate what it means to live at the margins and still thrive. They show us that being a Black woman (Negra) in Mexico is not solely about enduring oppression—it is also about cultivating joy, identity, and solidarity in the face of it. This film is highly recommended because the viewer is presented with a view of racism within the Mexican community which in actuality extends to other ethnic groups as well. The viewer gets to see how intra-racial discrimination within minority groups based on skin color or other characteristics like hair and social status impact the women seen in this film. Racial identity of some of these women is at first questioned by some but they soon realize and defend their “Afro-Mexican’ heritage. Awards:Lola Award (10th Philadelphia Latino Film Festival, USA); Audience Award for Best Documentary (37th Chicago Latino Film Festival, USA); Silver medal (40th International URTI Grand Prix for Author’s Documentary, France); Best Mexican Documentary Feature Award (16th Monterrey International Film Festival, Mexico); Best movie Award (14th International African Film Festival of Argentina); Arcoiris Audience Award & Malvinas Award (36th Trieste Latin American Film Festival, Italy); Best First Time Filmmaker (II FICIMAD Festival Internacional de Cine Independiente de Madrid, Spain); Best Film in the categories of Indigenous and Afro-descendant Women, and Afro Peoples (VII FicWallMapu, Chile); Jury Award for Best Documentary Film, Women category (XII Encuentro Hispanoamericano De Cine Y Video Documental Independiente: Contra El Silencio Todas Las Voces, Mexico); Áfrika feature film Prize (XVII Festival de cine Arica Nativa, Chile); Best Documentary (V Quibdo Africa Film Festival, Colombia); Prize “Hechos de Mujeres: Mujeres que luchan” (IX Festival Internacional de Cine de Fusagasugá FICFUSA, Colombia); Silver Level Remi Award in Film & Video Productions in the category Ethnic/Cultural (54th WorldFest-Houston, USA); Honourable Mention (21th aluCine Latin Film + Media Arts Festival, Canada); Honourable Mention (24th José Rovirosa Award, Mexico)

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,663
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,007
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,049
Tête enseignante GPT0,410
Écart entre enseignants0,361 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueEducational Media Reviews OnlineMême sujetLatin American and Latino StudiesTravaux en français237 207