MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7161727875 · doi:10.59236/emro.v27i7a353

Negra

2025· article· W7161727875 on OpenAlex
LaRoi Lawton

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueEducational Media Reviews Online · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLatin American and Latino Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResistance (ecology)RacismEthnic groupBeautyInvisibilitySpace (punctuation)Race (biology)Intersection (aeronautics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Distributed by Terra Nostra FilmsProduced by Daniela Contreras, Medhin Tewolde Serrano, and Nicolas DéfosséDirected by Medhin Tewolde Serrano2020, Streaming, 72 mins Negra explores the explicit fact of racism from a Mexican viewpoint, through English subtitles, which in actuality speaks to the inherent racial discrimination within many ethnic groups today. This film introduces the viewer to five Mexican Black women who speak to their personal experience of racism, not only from friends but family members, based solely on the color of their skin, not their Mexican heritage. To be a Black woman in Mexico, through the eyes of the five women portrayed in this film, is to navigate a complex intersection of identity, history, and resistance in a country that has often denied the visibility and contributions of its Afro-descendant population. Their lived experiences reveal a layered reality marked by racism, cultural erasure, and the resilience required to reclaim space and voice. Racism, both subtle and overt, is a daily reality. These women recount how their society imposes Eurocentric beauty standards, stereotypes Blackness as foreign or inferior, and erases African heritage from national narratives. They are frequently mistaken as outsiders in their own country, forced to explain or defend their identity. Yet, amid this marginalization, resistance flourishes. These women resist by embracing and preserving Afro-Mexican traditions, by speaking out in public spaces, and by forming community networks that affirm their heritage. Through activism, art, education, and storytelling, they confront systemic injustices and demand recognition—not just for themselves, but for future generations like them. The journey also involves a profound process of self-acceptance. For many, coming into their Blackness in a society that discourages it means unlearning internalized racism and reclaiming pride in their roots. This process is often personal and politically shaped by family, community, and a growing awareness of global Black movements. Ultimately, their voices illuminate what it means to live at the margins and still thrive. They show us that being a Black woman (Negra) in Mexico is not solely about enduring oppression—it is also about cultivating joy, identity, and solidarity in the face of it. This film is highly recommended because the viewer is presented with a view of racism within the Mexican community which in actuality extends to other ethnic groups as well. The viewer gets to see how intra-racial discrimination within minority groups based on skin color or other characteristics like hair and social status impact the women seen in this film. Racial identity of some of these women is at first questioned by some but they soon realize and defend their “Afro-Mexican’ heritage. Awards:Lola Award (10th Philadelphia Latino Film Festival, USA); Audience Award for Best Documentary (37th Chicago Latino Film Festival, USA); Silver medal (40th International URTI Grand Prix for Author’s Documentary, France); Best Mexican Documentary Feature Award (16th Monterrey International Film Festival, Mexico); Best movie Award (14th International African Film Festival of Argentina); Arcoiris Audience Award & Malvinas Award (36th Trieste Latin American Film Festival, Italy); Best First Time Filmmaker (II FICIMAD Festival Internacional de Cine Independiente de Madrid, Spain); Best Film in the categories of Indigenous and Afro-descendant Women, and Afro Peoples (VII FicWallMapu, Chile); Jury Award for Best Documentary Film, Women category (XII Encuentro Hispanoamericano De Cine Y Video Documental Independiente: Contra El Silencio Todas Las Voces, Mexico); Áfrika feature film Prize (XVII Festival de cine Arica Nativa, Chile); Best Documentary (V Quibdo Africa Film Festival, Colombia); Prize “Hechos de Mujeres: Mujeres que luchan” (IX Festival Internacional de Cine de Fusagasugá FICFUSA, Colombia); Silver Level Remi Award in Film & Video Productions in the category Ethnic/Cultural (54th WorldFest-Houston, USA); Honourable Mention (21th aluCine Latin Film + Media Arts Festival, Canada); Honourable Mention (24th José Rovirosa Award, Mexico)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.663
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.410
Teacher spread0.361 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it