MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7161750233 · doi:10.59236/emro.v27i4a582

War for the Woods

2025· article· W7161750233 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Abbey Lewis

Notice bibliographique

RevueEducational Media Reviews Online · 2025
Typearticle
Langue
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueCanadian Identity and History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSound (geography)LoggingClearcuttingRainforestTemperate rainforestSpanish Civil War

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Distributed by Bullfrog Films, PO Box 149, Oley, PA 19547; 800-543-FROG (3764)Produced by Nina BeveridgeDirected by Sean Stiller and Geoff Morrison2023, Streaming, 44 mins Over three decades ago a series of protest blockades known as the War in the Woods prevented logging companies from clearcutting old-growth forests in Clayoquot Sound in British Columbia, the current home of the Ahousaht, Hesquiaht, and the Tla-o-qui-aht First Nations. At their most powerful point in the summer of 1993, thousands of activists joined the protests, resulting in the arrests of over 800 people. Meanwhile, media attention from around the world drew support for the protection of Clayoquot Sound, with members of the public joining in boycotts of companies that manufactured their products using timber from British Columbia. Eventually, designated areas of the Clayoquot Sound ancient forests were preserved, and First Nations were given a voice in the future of the region. War for the Woods, a film by Sean Stiller and Geoff Morrison, examines the history of the Clayoquot Sound protests, asking how to make critical use of lessons learned in their aftermath. There is no single correct approach to look back on the blockades and ensuing events and War for the Woods does an excellent job of blending ways of retrospectively analyzing the protests into a cohesive whole. Scientific facts about old-growth forests supply viewers with foundational knowledge for understanding why so many people have taken an interest in Clayoquot Sound. As part of a temperate rainforest the trees there have incredible carbon-sequestering capabilities and support a diverse ecosystem. The protests themselves can be recognized as historic events, not only for the number of arrests, but also for the strategy employed. Environmental organizations involved there had long recognized the futility of continuing to work with politicians and logging companies and made a tactical decision to raise clearcutting from a regional to an international issue. While the film highlights the importance of this work in preserving areas of Clayoquot Sound, it places it alongside an uncomfortable fact - clearcutting is still routinely practiced throughout Canadian old-growth forests. However, the most important voices that War for the Woods brings to this analysis of the protests and ongoing conservation efforts are those of Clayoquot Sound’s indigenous people. In an early, poignant moment, Peggy Fraser, an indigenous activist who was arrested during the summer of 1993, recounts a conversation with her uncle about her role there. He insists that she was correcting, not protesting, and offers a word from their language that better describes her actions. The film also highlights modern indigenous-led preservation and protection efforts, consistently depicting environmental stewardship and knowledge as a cultural value rooted in the belief that the Canadian wilderness isn’t the product of ecological spontaneity, but instead a garden that’s been carefully cultivated by generations of indigenous peoples. War for the Woods would be excellent learning material for classes covering the application of indigenous values, practices, and ways of knowing to mainstream science, as well as classes examining activism and protest movements. Approaches used in the film for examining a single event (scientific, activist, indigenous) may be transferable to other course material. The film is recommended for colleges and universities with environmental science or ecology programs, and for public libraries, particularly those serving communities with a history of activism. Awards:Best Environmental Documentary, Montreal Independent Film Festival; Golden Sheaf / Indigenous Award, Yorkton Film Festival

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,606
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,006
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0050,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,043
Tête enseignante GPT0,367
Écart entre enseignants0,324 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueEducational Media Reviews OnlineMême sujetCanadian Identity and HistoryTravaux en français237 207