MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7161750233 · doi:10.59236/emro.v27i4a582

War for the Woods

2025· article· W7161750233 on OpenAlex
Abbey Lewis

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueEducational Media Reviews Online · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSound (geography)LoggingClearcuttingRainforestTemperate rainforestSpanish Civil War

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Distributed by Bullfrog Films, PO Box 149, Oley, PA 19547; 800-543-FROG (3764)Produced by Nina BeveridgeDirected by Sean Stiller and Geoff Morrison2023, Streaming, 44 mins Over three decades ago a series of protest blockades known as the War in the Woods prevented logging companies from clearcutting old-growth forests in Clayoquot Sound in British Columbia, the current home of the Ahousaht, Hesquiaht, and the Tla-o-qui-aht First Nations. At their most powerful point in the summer of 1993, thousands of activists joined the protests, resulting in the arrests of over 800 people. Meanwhile, media attention from around the world drew support for the protection of Clayoquot Sound, with members of the public joining in boycotts of companies that manufactured their products using timber from British Columbia. Eventually, designated areas of the Clayoquot Sound ancient forests were preserved, and First Nations were given a voice in the future of the region. War for the Woods, a film by Sean Stiller and Geoff Morrison, examines the history of the Clayoquot Sound protests, asking how to make critical use of lessons learned in their aftermath. There is no single correct approach to look back on the blockades and ensuing events and War for the Woods does an excellent job of blending ways of retrospectively analyzing the protests into a cohesive whole. Scientific facts about old-growth forests supply viewers with foundational knowledge for understanding why so many people have taken an interest in Clayoquot Sound. As part of a temperate rainforest the trees there have incredible carbon-sequestering capabilities and support a diverse ecosystem. The protests themselves can be recognized as historic events, not only for the number of arrests, but also for the strategy employed. Environmental organizations involved there had long recognized the futility of continuing to work with politicians and logging companies and made a tactical decision to raise clearcutting from a regional to an international issue. While the film highlights the importance of this work in preserving areas of Clayoquot Sound, it places it alongside an uncomfortable fact - clearcutting is still routinely practiced throughout Canadian old-growth forests. However, the most important voices that War for the Woods brings to this analysis of the protests and ongoing conservation efforts are those of Clayoquot Sound’s indigenous people. In an early, poignant moment, Peggy Fraser, an indigenous activist who was arrested during the summer of 1993, recounts a conversation with her uncle about her role there. He insists that she was correcting, not protesting, and offers a word from their language that better describes her actions. The film also highlights modern indigenous-led preservation and protection efforts, consistently depicting environmental stewardship and knowledge as a cultural value rooted in the belief that the Canadian wilderness isn’t the product of ecological spontaneity, but instead a garden that’s been carefully cultivated by generations of indigenous peoples. War for the Woods would be excellent learning material for classes covering the application of indigenous values, practices, and ways of knowing to mainstream science, as well as classes examining activism and protest movements. Approaches used in the film for examining a single event (scientific, activist, indigenous) may be transferable to other course material. The film is recommended for colleges and universities with environmental science or ecology programs, and for public libraries, particularly those serving communities with a history of activism. Awards:Best Environmental Documentary, Montreal Independent Film Festival; Golden Sheaf / Indigenous Award, Yorkton Film Festival

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.606
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it