Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Distributed by Good DocsProduced by Patricio Cohn and Shannon CohnDirected by Shannon Cohn2023, Streaming, 52 mins Below the Belt shines a light on the problems with our healthcare systems by sharing the experiences of four women with endometriosis, a common condition where tissue similar to uterine tissue grows outside of the uterus. It is often painful, causing inflammation and scar tissue in the pelvic region as well as infertility in some cases. Additionally, gender bias in healthcare and poorly informed doctors lead to significant delays in diagnosis and care. Below the Belt delves into the causes and effects of this health disparity in a thought-provoking and informative way. Below the Belt primarily follows four women with endometriosis. It shows many facets to living with endometriosis, including difficulties getting diagnoses, the negative ways chronic pain has affected their lives and the harsh treatments they have received. These segments are a powerful way of showing how endometriosis effects patients. It is particularly moving to see how Kyung, a visual artist, depicts her pain through her art as she struggles with infertility and pregnancy loss. These women’s experiences also touch on the ways that endometriosis care is lacking; the documentary shows difficulty getting diagnoses, having to pay for expensive surgery out of pocket, and, in one case, show delays in care and treatment lead to worse outcomes for patients. These sections put a powerful human face to a very common issue. The documentary balances these personal stories with testimonials and video clips of additional women’s experiences, headlines of news stories, and facts or statistics displayed as text. Additionally, some endometriosis specialists are included to provide an expert point of view. This gives a more complete picture of the many issues surrounding the diagnosis and treatment of endometriosis, marginalization of women’s health issues, and the advocacy work around endometriosis. Below the Belt shows a wide breadth of information on this complex topic, effectively balancing factual information and individual experiences. The only downside to Below the Belt is that it solely presents the perspective of cis women. As endometriosis also affects a number of trans and non-binary people, it would have been good to acknowledge the experience of trans and non-binary people with endometriosis. Most of the language in the documentary refers exclusively to women, however, the title cards the documentary uses to share facts about endometriosis do use gender inclusive language. Those looking for a more inclusive discussion of healthcare challenges faced by uterus-havers should look elsewhere. Below the Belt is a fantastic, moving documentary. It provides a well-rounded look into the complex issue of endometriosis, showing the human cost of gender bias in health care. Given how poorly endometriosis is diagnosed and how many health practitioners provide inadequate care for endometriosis patients, this would be a vital addition to any medical curriculum. It would also be great for women’s studies or gender studies courses.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,006 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,006 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,728 | 0,412 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; l’étiquette directe de Gemma et le classifieur distillé Codex s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».