Bibliographic record
Abstract
Distributed by Good DocsProduced by Patricio Cohn and Shannon CohnDirected by Shannon Cohn2023, Streaming, 52 mins Below the Belt shines a light on the problems with our healthcare systems by sharing the experiences of four women with endometriosis, a common condition where tissue similar to uterine tissue grows outside of the uterus. It is often painful, causing inflammation and scar tissue in the pelvic region as well as infertility in some cases. Additionally, gender bias in healthcare and poorly informed doctors lead to significant delays in diagnosis and care. Below the Belt delves into the causes and effects of this health disparity in a thought-provoking and informative way. Below the Belt primarily follows four women with endometriosis. It shows many facets to living with endometriosis, including difficulties getting diagnoses, the negative ways chronic pain has affected their lives and the harsh treatments they have received. These segments are a powerful way of showing how endometriosis effects patients. It is particularly moving to see how Kyung, a visual artist, depicts her pain through her art as she struggles with infertility and pregnancy loss. These women’s experiences also touch on the ways that endometriosis care is lacking; the documentary shows difficulty getting diagnoses, having to pay for expensive surgery out of pocket, and, in one case, show delays in care and treatment lead to worse outcomes for patients. These sections put a powerful human face to a very common issue. The documentary balances these personal stories with testimonials and video clips of additional women’s experiences, headlines of news stories, and facts or statistics displayed as text. Additionally, some endometriosis specialists are included to provide an expert point of view. This gives a more complete picture of the many issues surrounding the diagnosis and treatment of endometriosis, marginalization of women’s health issues, and the advocacy work around endometriosis. Below the Belt shows a wide breadth of information on this complex topic, effectively balancing factual information and individual experiences. The only downside to Below the Belt is that it solely presents the perspective of cis women. As endometriosis also affects a number of trans and non-binary people, it would have been good to acknowledge the experience of trans and non-binary people with endometriosis. Most of the language in the documentary refers exclusively to women, however, the title cards the documentary uses to share facts about endometriosis do use gender inclusive language. Those looking for a more inclusive discussion of healthcare challenges faced by uterus-havers should look elsewhere. Below the Belt is a fantastic, moving documentary. It provides a well-rounded look into the complex issue of endometriosis, showing the human cost of gender bias in health care. Given how poorly endometriosis is diagnosed and how many health practitioners provide inadequate care for endometriosis patients, this would be a vital addition to any medical curriculum. It would also be great for women’s studies or gender studies courses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.023 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".