Modeling the impact of the curb radius on operating speeds and other surrogate safety measures using video and GPS trajectory data
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Motor-vehicle turning maneuvers at intersections are often involved in crashes and serious injuries, in particular collisions involving vulnerable road users. In Canada alone, 30% of fatalities and 40% of serious injuries took place in intersections. Thus, to improve intersection safety, geometric design related treatments have been implemented and studied in past literature. These include curb radius reduction and curb extensions which aim to reduce turning speeds and crossing distances. The radius effects and treatments have been investigated for large intersections and road curves in rural areas using observed crash and point-speed measures, with limited studies examining small urban intersections. With the help of modern data collection techniques (video footage and GPS data), this study aims to fill the gaps presented in the literature on the investigation of the safety of curb radii and other geometric elements in local urban intersections using surrogate safety measures derived from vehicle trajectories and statistical regression models. More specifically, this research aims at: (1) develop a methodology to evaluate the impact of the curb radius on the speed of vehicle turning maneuvers in local intersections with small radius using Montreal video trajectory data and a cross-sectional approach. (2) To evaluate the safety effectiveness of curb radius reduction as a traffic calming treatment using a naïve before-after study and video data collected from two intersections in Toronto, Canada. In addition to speeds, post-encroachment time is used as a surrogate indicator, (3) To expand on the use of GPS smartphone data for establishing a methodology for evaluating the safety of turning movements to overcome the shortcomings of video cameras. For this purpose, GPS-based surrogate safety measures (85th percentile, median speeds, and deceleration) were extracted and modeled using mixed-effect regression models for a large data set from Quebec City.Among other results, a statistically positive and significant association between the radius and speed measures was observed for the video trajectory data. For instance, in the cross-sectional analysis, an increase of 1-meter in the curb radius results in an increase of 0.775 kph for the 85th speed and 1.208 kph for the median speed for all turns. For the before-after study, an average decrease was witnessed for all speed measurements for both intersections studied after the curb reduction treatment implementation. The countermeasure contributed to 1.6 kph and 0.783 kph decrease for 85th percentile and median speed, respectively, for both intersections when examined using the mixed-effects linear regression models. Lastly, using GPS smartphone data, the findings also support the relation between exhibited speeds and the measured corner curb radius. Using regression models of speeds, for every 1-meter increase in the measured curb radius, a statistically significant increase of 0.4 kph in both 85th percentile and median speeds was observed. Other intersections attributes, like the signalization, had an influence on the speed measures. As for the deceleration models, an increase of 1-meter in the radius resulted in a 0.01 m/s2 increase in the severity, thus, decreasing the safety of the intersection. Overall, the effectiveness of curb radius and reduction treatment was confirmed in the three different case studies. Despite the modest impacts in most of the cases, the importance of radius reductions is implied. Also, future work is required to address the limitations presented by the filtering techniques for the GPS data. Moreover, cross-calibration of the models can be used to evaluate the means of data collection by collecting GPS data for the video trajectory models and vise-versa
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,010 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».