MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7162100345 · doi:10.82308/25721

Modeling the impact of the curb radius on operating speeds and other surrogate safety measures using video and GPS trajectory data

2020· dissertation· en· W7162100345 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yousteena Bocktor

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTraffic and Road Safety
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntersection (aeronautics)Global Positioning SystemTurning radiusTrajectoryRADIUSData collectionReduction (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Motor-vehicle turning maneuvers at intersections are often involved in crashes and serious injuries, in particular collisions involving vulnerable road users. In Canada alone, 30% of fatalities and 40% of serious injuries took place in intersections. Thus, to improve intersection safety, geometric design related treatments have been implemented and studied in past literature. These include curb radius reduction and curb extensions which aim to reduce turning speeds and crossing distances. The radius effects and treatments have been investigated for large intersections and road curves in rural areas using observed crash and point-speed measures, with limited studies examining small urban intersections. With the help of modern data collection techniques (video footage and GPS data), this study aims to fill the gaps presented in the literature on the investigation of the safety of curb radii and other geometric elements in local urban intersections using surrogate safety measures derived from vehicle trajectories and statistical regression models. More specifically, this research aims at: (1) develop a methodology to evaluate the impact of the curb radius on the speed of vehicle turning maneuvers in local intersections with small radius using Montreal video trajectory data and a cross-sectional approach. (2) To evaluate the safety effectiveness of curb radius reduction as a traffic calming treatment using a naïve before-after study and video data collected from two intersections in Toronto, Canada. In addition to speeds, post-encroachment time is used as a surrogate indicator, (3) To expand on the use of GPS smartphone data for establishing a methodology for evaluating the safety of turning movements to overcome the shortcomings of video cameras. For this purpose, GPS-based surrogate safety measures (85th percentile, median speeds, and deceleration) were extracted and modeled using mixed-effect regression models for a large data set from Quebec City.Among other results, a statistically positive and significant association between the radius and speed measures was observed for the video trajectory data. For instance, in the cross-sectional analysis, an increase of 1-meter in the curb radius results in an increase of 0.775 kph for the 85th speed and 1.208 kph for the median speed for all turns. For the before-after study, an average decrease was witnessed for all speed measurements for both intersections studied after the curb reduction treatment implementation. The countermeasure contributed to 1.6 kph and 0.783 kph decrease for 85th percentile and median speed, respectively, for both intersections when examined using the mixed-effects linear regression models. Lastly, using GPS smartphone data, the findings also support the relation between exhibited speeds and the measured corner curb radius. Using regression models of speeds, for every 1-meter increase in the measured curb radius, a statistically significant increase of 0.4 kph in both 85th percentile and median speeds was observed. Other intersections attributes, like the signalization, had an influence on the speed measures. As for the deceleration models, an increase of 1-meter in the radius resulted in a 0.01 m/s2 increase in the severity, thus, decreasing the safety of the intersection. Overall, the effectiveness of curb radius and reduction treatment was confirmed in the three different case studies. Despite the modest impacts in most of the cases, the importance of radius reductions is implied. Also, future work is required to address the limitations presented by the filtering techniques for the GPS data. Moreover, cross-calibration of the models can be used to evaluate the means of data collection by collecting GPS data for the video trajectory models and vise-versa

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.252
Threshold uncertainty score0.501

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTraffic and Road Safety→French-language works237,207→