MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7162138052 · doi:10.1108/ce-06-2005-0007

In Memoriam: John Wilson: 1928-2003

2005· article· en· W7162138052 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of research in character education · 2005
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueValues and Moral Education
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésNewspaperScholarshipWork (physics)Moral philosophyUnit (ring theory)

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

John Boyd Wilson was born the son of an Anglican clergyman in 1928. He won scholarships to Winchester College, then to New College Oxford, where he took a double first in classics and philosophy. Following 9 years as a schoolteacher, he taught briefly at the Universities of Toronto and Sussex, before helping in 1965 to set up the Farmington Trust Research Unit in Moral Education at Oxford, which he directed until 1972. From Farmington he moved to the Oxford University Department of Educational Studies, where he remained as lecturer and latterly senior research associate until his death in August 2003.Throughout his life, John Wilson was amazingly prolific. He was sole author of some 30 books and editor or joint contributor to a further seven, virtually all published by major international companies. He contributed countless journal articles and book chapters, as well as newspaper and magazine articles. His early work included classical history and general topics, but the bulk of his contribution was in the philosophy of education, in particular moral or values education, with his most recent work extending into love and social relationships.John’s design for the Farmington Trust and the work he achieved there constituted a major step for values education and provide a clear illustration of talents and approaches that were in a number of respects ahead of their time. Farmington was, for example, intended to embody interdisciplinary collaboration drawing on philosophy, psychology and sociology, an aspiration that even today remains a major but challenging requirement for real progress in values education. At Farmington, John Wilson became founding editor of Moral Education, the immediate forerunner of The Journal of Moral Education.Likewise, the most noteworthy component of the seminal Farmington output An Introduction to Moral Education (1967) was his attempt to map out the meaning of being morally educated. In the face of the usual sectional polarizations plaguing educational thinking, this was a clearly articulated, nonreductionist, integrated approach built around the concept of person. A morally educated person is one who at various levels grasps and respects what it is to be a person in their dealings with others and self. This involves not only understanding of the concept, but its use in reasoning and problem solving concerning appropriate action, interpersonal sensitivity and ability to translate intention into action.Nowadays, in an educational world dominated by concerns with purpose and accountability, such a contribution would surely gain influential recognition. But U.K. educational circles, whose long-standing suspicion of explicit articulation and analysis was being reinforced at the time by reaction to the behavioural objectives movement across the Atlantic, offered less fertile ground. Hence John Wilson became no less renowned outside his own country: although “prophet” is a term he would certainly have scoffed at, it is perhaps ironic that today leading U.K. writings on social and moral education stress the centrality of personhood.That John Wilson continued to explore and develop his ideas without cease would come as no surprise to anyone who had any extended contact with him, as was my privilege, working with him during his final year at the Farmington Trust and beyond. John was unfailingly charming and thoughtful, humorous and provocative, curious and open, focused and incredibly industrious. His fluency and razor-sharp ability were accompanied by a true modesty and sensitivity. We celebrate a great moral educator and fellow human, and we mourn his loss.Peter Tomlinson

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,007
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,541
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,702

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0070,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,137
Tête enseignante GPT0,538
Écart entre enseignants0,401 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2005
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of research in character educationMême sujetValues and Moral EducationTravaux en français237 207