MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7162138052 · doi:10.1108/ce-06-2005-0007

In Memoriam: John Wilson: 1928-2003

2005· article· en· W7162138052 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of research in character education · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicValues and Moral Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNewspaperScholarshipWork (physics)Moral philosophyUnit (ring theory)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

John Boyd Wilson was born the son of an Anglican clergyman in 1928. He won scholarships to Winchester College, then to New College Oxford, where he took a double first in classics and philosophy. Following 9 years as a schoolteacher, he taught briefly at the Universities of Toronto and Sussex, before helping in 1965 to set up the Farmington Trust Research Unit in Moral Education at Oxford, which he directed until 1972. From Farmington he moved to the Oxford University Department of Educational Studies, where he remained as lecturer and latterly senior research associate until his death in August 2003.Throughout his life, John Wilson was amazingly prolific. He was sole author of some 30 books and editor or joint contributor to a further seven, virtually all published by major international companies. He contributed countless journal articles and book chapters, as well as newspaper and magazine articles. His early work included classical history and general topics, but the bulk of his contribution was in the philosophy of education, in particular moral or values education, with his most recent work extending into love and social relationships.John’s design for the Farmington Trust and the work he achieved there constituted a major step for values education and provide a clear illustration of talents and approaches that were in a number of respects ahead of their time. Farmington was, for example, intended to embody interdisciplinary collaboration drawing on philosophy, psychology and sociology, an aspiration that even today remains a major but challenging requirement for real progress in values education. At Farmington, John Wilson became founding editor of Moral Education, the immediate forerunner of The Journal of Moral Education.Likewise, the most noteworthy component of the seminal Farmington output An Introduction to Moral Education (1967) was his attempt to map out the meaning of being morally educated. In the face of the usual sectional polarizations plaguing educational thinking, this was a clearly articulated, nonreductionist, integrated approach built around the concept of person. A morally educated person is one who at various levels grasps and respects what it is to be a person in their dealings with others and self. This involves not only understanding of the concept, but its use in reasoning and problem solving concerning appropriate action, interpersonal sensitivity and ability to translate intention into action.Nowadays, in an educational world dominated by concerns with purpose and accountability, such a contribution would surely gain influential recognition. But U.K. educational circles, whose long-standing suspicion of explicit articulation and analysis was being reinforced at the time by reaction to the behavioural objectives movement across the Atlantic, offered less fertile ground. Hence John Wilson became no less renowned outside his own country: although “prophet” is a term he would certainly have scoffed at, it is perhaps ironic that today leading U.K. writings on social and moral education stress the centrality of personhood.That John Wilson continued to explore and develop his ideas without cease would come as no surprise to anyone who had any extended contact with him, as was my privilege, working with him during his final year at the Farmington Trust and beyond. John was unfailingly charming and thoughtful, humorous and provocative, curious and open, focused and incredibly industrious. His fluency and razor-sharp ability were accompanied by a true modesty and sensitivity. We celebrate a great moral educator and fellow human, and we mourn his loss.Peter Tomlinson

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.541
Threshold uncertainty score0.702

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.137
GPT teacher head0.538
Teacher spread0.401 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of research in character educationSame topicValues and Moral EducationFrench-language works237,207