ACTIVITY OF THE MINISTER OF RELIGION OF THE UKRAINIAN NATIONAL REPUBLIC’S COUNCIL OF PEOPLE’S MINISTERS PROF. I. OHIENKO (1919–1922)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The article focuses on analysis of activity of Professor I. Ohienko as a Minister of religion and his influence on public and religious life in Ukraine during national liberation struggle of our people during 1917–1921. Considering the importance and authorityof Professor I.Ohienko (who became the Metropolitan Ilarion (Ohienko) of the Ukrainian Greek-Orthodox Church of Canada during 1951–1972), the authors of the study tried to show the state acivity of this historycal person during military defense of the Ukrainian people against aggression at the beginning of the XXth century both from the East and the West. The fact of strong opposition of the pro-Russian episcopate and clergy to the vigorous activity of the Minister of religion of the Ukrainian National Republic, Prof. I.Ohienko was considered separately as well as the Minister’s concern for international recognition of autocephaly of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church. In this artcle an attempt was made, on the basis of existing and accessible archive and documentary sources to reveal the problem of church-state relations that was important at that time (as well as today) which had one purpose – the recognition of the Ukrainian state and its government in 1919–1921. It is significant for this study to involve archive and documentary sources that need further enquiry because not all of these sources are accessible for technical or other reasons. The aim of the study is to reveal the problem of the tragic past and encourage contemporary Ukrainian historians, theologians and religious scholars to in-depth study of eminent personalities. The relevance of the study. This year marks the centenary since the appointment of Prof. I. Ohienko as a Minister of religion who actively contributed to realization of the idea of autocephaly of UOC, the basis for which was established by the Law of 1 January 1919 [67, p. 3], and the Decree of the Directory of the Ukrainian National Republic of 7 October 1919 [65, p. 58–59], undoubtedly coauthored by I.Ohienko himself. The analysis of recent study. The following Ukrainian church researchers have dealt with this issue of study: Andrusyshyn B. [71], Liakhotskyi V. [77, 78], Nestulia O. [80], Starodub A. [82, 83], Tymoshyk M. [84], and the archpriest Yosyfchuk M. [76]. Ariev V. [75]. A separate general negative assessment of the activity of the Ukrainian authorities in 1917–1921 for the establishment of autocephaly of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church was made by contemporary Russian historians – Shkvarovskyi M. [85, p. 106], and the archpriest Tsypin V. [86, p. 366, 379] but they did not mention Prof. I. Ohienko. At the end of the study a photo, a brief biography of Professor Ivan Ohienko and the text of the Decree on autocephaly of the UOC of 7 October 1919 are provided for review and analysis.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».