ACTIVITY OF THE MINISTER OF RELIGION OF THE UKRAINIAN NATIONAL REPUBLIC’S COUNCIL OF PEOPLE’S MINISTERS PROF. I. OHIENKO (1919–1922)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article focuses on analysis of activity of Professor I. Ohienko as a Minister of religion and his influence on public and religious life in Ukraine during national liberation struggle of our people during 1917–1921. Considering the importance and authorityof Professor I.Ohienko (who became the Metropolitan Ilarion (Ohienko) of the Ukrainian Greek-Orthodox Church of Canada during 1951–1972), the authors of the study tried to show the state acivity of this historycal person during military defense of the Ukrainian people against aggression at the beginning of the XXth century both from the East and the West. The fact of strong opposition of the pro-Russian episcopate and clergy to the vigorous activity of the Minister of religion of the Ukrainian National Republic, Prof. I.Ohienko was considered separately as well as the Minister’s concern for international recognition of autocephaly of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church. In this artcle an attempt was made, on the basis of existing and accessible archive and documentary sources to reveal the problem of church-state relations that was important at that time (as well as today) which had one purpose – the recognition of the Ukrainian state and its government in 1919–1921. It is significant for this study to involve archive and documentary sources that need further enquiry because not all of these sources are accessible for technical or other reasons. The aim of the study is to reveal the problem of the tragic past and encourage contemporary Ukrainian historians, theologians and religious scholars to in-depth study of eminent personalities. The relevance of the study. This year marks the centenary since the appointment of Prof. I. Ohienko as a Minister of religion who actively contributed to realization of the idea of autocephaly of UOC, the basis for which was established by the Law of 1 January 1919 [67, p. 3], and the Decree of the Directory of the Ukrainian National Republic of 7 October 1919 [65, p. 58–59], undoubtedly coauthored by I.Ohienko himself. The analysis of recent study. The following Ukrainian church researchers have dealt with this issue of study: Andrusyshyn B. [71], Liakhotskyi V. [77, 78], Nestulia O. [80], Starodub A. [82, 83], Tymoshyk M. [84], and the archpriest Yosyfchuk M. [76]. Ariev V. [75]. A separate general negative assessment of the activity of the Ukrainian authorities in 1917–1921 for the establishment of autocephaly of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church was made by contemporary Russian historians – Shkvarovskyi M. [85, p. 106], and the archpriest Tsypin V. [86, p. 366, 379] but they did not mention Prof. I. Ohienko. At the end of the study a photo, a brief biography of Professor Ivan Ohienko and the text of the Decree on autocephaly of the UOC of 7 October 1919 are provided for review and analysis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".