MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7164976496

Après le stigmate, la spirale précarisante : récits des personnes LGBTQIA+ accueillies au Refuge: Panorama 2025 de l'Observatoire des vulnérabilités queers

2025· report· fr· W7164976496 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Loïc Chave

Notice bibliographique

RevueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · 2025
Typereport
Languefr
Domaine
Thématique
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésQuarter (Canadian coin)PanoramaService (business)State (computer science)Virtuous circle and vicious circle
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Through the collection and study of narratives from individuals supported by Le Refuge, this new edition of the Panorama aims to document the "precariousness spiral", the path that leads LGBTQIA+ individuals to the doorstep of Le Refuge. This report describes a vicious triangle: stigma, precariousness, and deteriorating health, all of which are mutually reinforcing. At the end of this spiral lies a double disqualification: first as LGBTQIA+ individuals, and then as precarious persons. In response, the need for "Refuge Capital" is vital. In 2025, Le Refuge's helpline received an average of 39 calls per day.Family and School: The Roots of ExclusionStigmatization begins within the family circle. Individuals supported by Le Refuge report domestic violence involving physical, psychological, incestuous, and economic abuse, as well as conversion therapies, evictions, and family estrangement. In France, nearly one in five LGBTQIA+ persons reports having undergone conversion therapy. Child Protective Services (ASE) are described as a temporary safety net that is not identity-affirming and ends abruptly at age 18.Violence extends from the family to the school setting. In France, 71% of LGBTQIA+ people report having been bullied at school by other students or teachers (60% of those aged 15-17). Beneficiaries describe verbal, physical, and institutional assaults that weaken their educational paths and heighten precariousness. 45% of those sheltered by Le Refuge in 2025 report having dropped out of school. Despite offensives against relationship and sex education in schools, only a quarter of French people are opposed to children being sensitized to the fight against LGBTI-phobia or to the State investing further in this area.Exile and MigrationSome flee their families, others their countries. In 2024, Le Refuge sheltered and supported 267 people who fled their home countries, originating from 55 different nations. Common origins include Congo-Kinshasa, Ivory Coast, Algeria, Russia, Guinea, Sierra Leone, Nigeria, and Morocco. Behind these figures lie migratory routes marked by extreme violence: sudden departures following a "coming-out" or "outing," blocked bank accounts, sexual violence on the road, kidnapping, and unanswered ransom demands from rejecting families. Upon arrival in France, they describe a journey marked by exhaustion, lack of legal status, and administrative precariousness.Employment and Housing: Systematic BarriersAccess to employment and financial security is rendered inaccessible by an accumulation of vulnerabilities: domestic and educational violence, school dropout, exile, administrative and professional discrimination, precarious contracts, and a lack of social networks. In the last twelve months, one in two trans women reported being discriminated against in employment or during a job search (46% for trans men). Without stable employment or a guarantor, renting is impossible. Discrimination in housing access exacerbates exclusion. Some individuals also experience domestic violence and can no longer turn to their families.Precariousness and HomelessnessIndividuals are exposed to extreme precariousness and homelessness. Wandering through parks, train stations, or temporary shelters exposes them to insecurity, hunger, and health risks, further fueling social disqualification: without an address, accessing fundamental rights is impossible. In this context, survival sometimes involves accepting abusive housing conditions or turning to sex work: 24% of those sheltered by Le Refuge in 2025 report engaging or having engaged in sex work.Emergency systems like the "115" (emergency social number), already saturated, prove unsuitable for queer people. Discriminations accumulate: forced placements contrary to gender identity, misgendering, stigmatizing remarks, and violence between users. Many prefer to stay outside rather than endure these humiliations. In 2025, nearly four out of ten beneficiaries report having suffered mistreatment in traditional shelters, and more than 90 people were waiting for a spot at Le Refuge by the end of the summer.Minority Stress and HealthThe stigmatization of LGBTQIA+ individuals generates constant "minority stress", a psychological and biological overload linked to discrimination and invisibility. This manifests as external stressors (assault, harassment, institutional discrimination) and internal stressors (hypervigilance, concealment, internalized homophobia/transphobia). Consequences include anxiety, depression, addictive behaviors, self-harm, and somatic issues (chronic inflammation, cardiovascular diseases). In the last two weeks in France, 85% of LGBTQIA+ people felt depressed (94% of 15-17 year-olds; 98% of trans adolescent girls; 99% of trans adolescent boys). Among those sheltered by Le Refuge in 2025, 41% report eating disorders and 30% report addictions.Homelessness worsens these vulnerabilities by interrupting healthcare and exposing individuals to further violence. The intersection of oppressions (racism, sexism, classism, serophobia, ableism, ageism) creates unique experiences of exclusion. Finally, discrimination within the healthcare system (refusal of care, misgendering, deadnaming...) leads nearly half of the beneficiaries to renounce care, worsening their condition.Reconstruction and RecommendationsIn the face of exclusion, affirming support becomes vital. The listening services offered by Le Refuge provide a space for recognition and safety, sometimes the only barrier against suicide. 34% of French LGBTQIA+ people have had suicidal thoughts in the past year, reaching 79% for trans boys aged 15-17. One in two trans adolescents in France has attempted suicide.Upon arrival at Le Refuge, many carry the traces of accumulated violence and experience psychological collapse once safe. These breakdowns are not individual weaknesses but the result of a long chain of ruptures. To break this spiral, Le Refuge recommends: training for child protection professionals, fighting discrimination in schools, protecting LGBTQIA+ asylum seekers (including abolishing the "safe country of origin" concept), creating affirming emergency shelters, and implementing health recommendations for trans individuals.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,004
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,025
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,051

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0040,005
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0060,005
Communication savante0,0060,009
Science ouverte0,0010,009
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0050,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,047
Tête enseignante GPT0,273
Écart entre enseignants0,226 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)→Travaux en français237 207→