Après le stigmate, la spirale précarisante : récits des personnes LGBTQIA+ accueillies au Refuge: Panorama 2025 de l'Observatoire des vulnérabilités queers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Through the collection and study of narratives from individuals supported by Le Refuge, this new edition of the Panorama aims to document the "precariousness spiral", the path that leads LGBTQIA+ individuals to the doorstep of Le Refuge. This report describes a vicious triangle: stigma, precariousness, and deteriorating health, all of which are mutually reinforcing. At the end of this spiral lies a double disqualification: first as LGBTQIA+ individuals, and then as precarious persons. In response, the need for "Refuge Capital" is vital. In 2025, Le Refuge's helpline received an average of 39 calls per day.Family and School: The Roots of ExclusionStigmatization begins within the family circle. Individuals supported by Le Refuge report domestic violence involving physical, psychological, incestuous, and economic abuse, as well as conversion therapies, evictions, and family estrangement. In France, nearly one in five LGBTQIA+ persons reports having undergone conversion therapy. Child Protective Services (ASE) are described as a temporary safety net that is not identity-affirming and ends abruptly at age 18.Violence extends from the family to the school setting. In France, 71% of LGBTQIA+ people report having been bullied at school by other students or teachers (60% of those aged 15-17). Beneficiaries describe verbal, physical, and institutional assaults that weaken their educational paths and heighten precariousness. 45% of those sheltered by Le Refuge in 2025 report having dropped out of school. Despite offensives against relationship and sex education in schools, only a quarter of French people are opposed to children being sensitized to the fight against LGBTI-phobia or to the State investing further in this area.Exile and MigrationSome flee their families, others their countries. In 2024, Le Refuge sheltered and supported 267 people who fled their home countries, originating from 55 different nations. Common origins include Congo-Kinshasa, Ivory Coast, Algeria, Russia, Guinea, Sierra Leone, Nigeria, and Morocco. Behind these figures lie migratory routes marked by extreme violence: sudden departures following a "coming-out" or "outing," blocked bank accounts, sexual violence on the road, kidnapping, and unanswered ransom demands from rejecting families. Upon arrival in France, they describe a journey marked by exhaustion, lack of legal status, and administrative precariousness.Employment and Housing: Systematic BarriersAccess to employment and financial security is rendered inaccessible by an accumulation of vulnerabilities: domestic and educational violence, school dropout, exile, administrative and professional discrimination, precarious contracts, and a lack of social networks. In the last twelve months, one in two trans women reported being discriminated against in employment or during a job search (46% for trans men). Without stable employment or a guarantor, renting is impossible. Discrimination in housing access exacerbates exclusion. Some individuals also experience domestic violence and can no longer turn to their families.Precariousness and HomelessnessIndividuals are exposed to extreme precariousness and homelessness. Wandering through parks, train stations, or temporary shelters exposes them to insecurity, hunger, and health risks, further fueling social disqualification: without an address, accessing fundamental rights is impossible. In this context, survival sometimes involves accepting abusive housing conditions or turning to sex work: 24% of those sheltered by Le Refuge in 2025 report engaging or having engaged in sex work.Emergency systems like the "115" (emergency social number), already saturated, prove unsuitable for queer people. Discriminations accumulate: forced placements contrary to gender identity, misgendering, stigmatizing remarks, and violence between users. Many prefer to stay outside rather than endure these humiliations. In 2025, nearly four out of ten beneficiaries report having suffered mistreatment in traditional shelters, and more than 90 people were waiting for a spot at Le Refuge by the end of the summer.Minority Stress and HealthThe stigmatization of LGBTQIA+ individuals generates constant "minority stress", a psychological and biological overload linked to discrimination and invisibility. This manifests as external stressors (assault, harassment, institutional discrimination) and internal stressors (hypervigilance, concealment, internalized homophobia/transphobia). Consequences include anxiety, depression, addictive behaviors, self-harm, and somatic issues (chronic inflammation, cardiovascular diseases). In the last two weeks in France, 85% of LGBTQIA+ people felt depressed (94% of 15-17 year-olds; 98% of trans adolescent girls; 99% of trans adolescent boys). Among those sheltered by Le Refuge in 2025, 41% report eating disorders and 30% report addictions.Homelessness worsens these vulnerabilities by interrupting healthcare and exposing individuals to further violence. The intersection of oppressions (racism, sexism, classism, serophobia, ableism, ageism) creates unique experiences of exclusion. Finally, discrimination within the healthcare system (refusal of care, misgendering, deadnaming...) leads nearly half of the beneficiaries to renounce care, worsening their condition.Reconstruction and RecommendationsIn the face of exclusion, affirming support becomes vital. The listening services offered by Le Refuge provide a space for recognition and safety, sometimes the only barrier against suicide. 34% of French LGBTQIA+ people have had suicidal thoughts in the past year, reaching 79% for trans boys aged 15-17. One in two trans adolescents in France has attempted suicide.Upon arrival at Le Refuge, many carry the traces of accumulated violence and experience psychological collapse once safe. These breakdowns are not individual weaknesses but the result of a long chain of ruptures. To break this spiral, Le Refuge recommends: training for child protection professionals, fighting discrimination in schools, protecting LGBTQIA+ asylum seekers (including abolishing the "safe country of origin" concept), creating affirming emergency shelters, and implementing health recommendations for trans individuals.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.009 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".