Association entre violences sexuelles et dysménorrhée : revue systématique de la littérature
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: According to the international literature, a history of abuse appears to have significant long-term consequences for both mental and physical health. More specifically, chronic pelvic pain has been identified at increased risk among women who have experienced sexual violence. Among such pain disorders, dysmenorrhea represents a major public health concern, with potentially severe implications for quality of life. Despite the respective morbidities of these conditions, few studies have examined the specific relationship between sexual violence and the risk of dysmenorrhea. The objective was thus to evaluate the existence of an association between sexual violence and dysmenorrhea in the international literature. Methods: A systematic review was conducted using PubMed and Google Scholar databases for studies published up to November 3, 2024. The research protocol was registered on PROSPERO. Observational studies in French or English assessing the statistical association between a history of sexual violence and dysmenorrhea were included. The target population was defined as women of reproductive age across all demographic profiles, including women with endometriosis. Studies exploring histories of sexual violence, regardless of the age at which they occurred, were considered, using a broad definition of such violence. The primary outcome was dysmenorrhea, assessed through several measures: presence, severity, or frequency. Methodological quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational studies. Results: Of the 362 studies initially identified, 8 were included in the final review. Five studies (62.5%) reported significant results supporting an association between sexual violence and the presence or severity of dysmenorrhea. Abuse occurring during childhood appeared to confer particularly high risk. Certain factors seemed likely to interfere with the statistical relationship, notably psychiatric comorbidities, which may play a mediating role. Conclusion: These findings suggest that women who have experienced sexual violence, particularly in childhood, may be at increased risk of developing dysmenorrhea, especially of greater severity. Further research, particularly high-quality longitudinal studies, is needed to explore this relationship and address a genuine public health issue.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,012 | 0,012 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».