Association entre violences sexuelles et dysménorrhée : revue systématique de la littérature
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: According to the international literature, a history of abuse appears to have significant long-term consequences for both mental and physical health. More specifically, chronic pelvic pain has been identified at increased risk among women who have experienced sexual violence. Among such pain disorders, dysmenorrhea represents a major public health concern, with potentially severe implications for quality of life. Despite the respective morbidities of these conditions, few studies have examined the specific relationship between sexual violence and the risk of dysmenorrhea. The objective was thus to evaluate the existence of an association between sexual violence and dysmenorrhea in the international literature. Methods: A systematic review was conducted using PubMed and Google Scholar databases for studies published up to November 3, 2024. The research protocol was registered on PROSPERO. Observational studies in French or English assessing the statistical association between a history of sexual violence and dysmenorrhea were included. The target population was defined as women of reproductive age across all demographic profiles, including women with endometriosis. Studies exploring histories of sexual violence, regardless of the age at which they occurred, were considered, using a broad definition of such violence. The primary outcome was dysmenorrhea, assessed through several measures: presence, severity, or frequency. Methodological quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational studies. Results: Of the 362 studies initially identified, 8 were included in the final review. Five studies (62.5%) reported significant results supporting an association between sexual violence and the presence or severity of dysmenorrhea. Abuse occurring during childhood appeared to confer particularly high risk. Certain factors seemed likely to interfere with the statistical relationship, notably psychiatric comorbidities, which may play a mediating role. Conclusion: These findings suggest that women who have experienced sexual violence, particularly in childhood, may be at increased risk of developing dysmenorrhea, especially of greater severity. Further research, particularly high-quality longitudinal studies, is needed to explore this relationship and address a genuine public health issue.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.012 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".