Notice bibliographique
Résumé
A 76-year-old woman was seen because of increasing pain in and deformity of her right knee. She revealed that when she was 4 years old she had injured her right knee and was hospitalized for some months. After her hospitalization, which did not involve any surgery, she was left with a stiff but painless knee. She stated that her knee was “straight,” by which she meant there was no varus or valgus deformity, but she also stated that her knee was always slightly flexed and could not be further flexed or extended. Despite this she was able to walk unlimited distances and to do hard physical work without any significant knee discomfort. Approximately 1 year before the current presentation she experienced increasing pain in her right knee. She was seen in consultation by an orthopedic surgeon who had suggested that she would be a candidate for knee replacement surgery and placed her on the waiting list for that operation. During this waiting period, she suffered increasing discomfort in her knee associated with significant deformity, which she said had progressed rapidly. She was also aware of increased swelling in her knee, but there was no increase in warmth and there was no local tenderness. On presentation, marked valgus deformity of the knee was noted, with a large knee effusion. There was only a jog of motion in both flexion and extension, but this was extremely painful; the valgus deformity could be corrected to neutral but also was very uncomfortable. Plain films (Fig. 1) demonstrated a marked valgus deformity with obvious destruction of the lateral compartment of the joint and a relatively well-preserved patellofemoral joint. Computed tomography was carried out to better define the joint surfaces and the degree of bone destruction. The lateral reconstruction view (Fig. 2) showed significant joint and subchondral destruction on both sides of the knee joint as well as adjacent bone erosions. FIG. 1. Anteroposterior (left) and lateral (right) views of the right knee demonstrating extreme valgus deformity and joint destruction. Figure 1 continued. FIG. 2. A lateral computed tomography scan of the right knee, demonstrating bone and joint destruction with erosions on both the femoral and tibial surfaces. Because of the patient's history of prolonged hospitalization at an early age and a possible history of pulmonary tuberculosis, a tuberculin skin test was done; the results were positive. A routine culture of aspirated material from the knee yielded no growth, but a culture for Mycobacterium tuberculosis was positive, and this was confirmed by the provincial laboratory. A knee arthrodesis was carried out combined with triple therapy postoperatively, with a successful outcome. Bone and joint tuberculosis is relatively rare in Canada today. Although it is occasionally seen in immigrants from areas in which the disease remains endemic and in the Aboriginal people of North America, it should be remembered that reactivation of bone and joint tuberculosis is a possibility at any time. In patients with an unusual clinical presentation of arthritis, especially associated with rapid bone and joint destruction without evidence of purulent infection, granulomatous infection should always be considered.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».