Bibliographic record
Abstract
A 76-year-old woman was seen because of increasing pain in and deformity of her right knee. She revealed that when she was 4 years old she had injured her right knee and was hospitalized for some months. After her hospitalization, which did not involve any surgery, she was left with a stiff but painless knee. She stated that her knee was “straight,” by which she meant there was no varus or valgus deformity, but she also stated that her knee was always slightly flexed and could not be further flexed or extended. Despite this she was able to walk unlimited distances and to do hard physical work without any significant knee discomfort. Approximately 1 year before the current presentation she experienced increasing pain in her right knee. She was seen in consultation by an orthopedic surgeon who had suggested that she would be a candidate for knee replacement surgery and placed her on the waiting list for that operation. During this waiting period, she suffered increasing discomfort in her knee associated with significant deformity, which she said had progressed rapidly. She was also aware of increased swelling in her knee, but there was no increase in warmth and there was no local tenderness. On presentation, marked valgus deformity of the knee was noted, with a large knee effusion. There was only a jog of motion in both flexion and extension, but this was extremely painful; the valgus deformity could be corrected to neutral but also was very uncomfortable. Plain films (Fig. 1) demonstrated a marked valgus deformity with obvious destruction of the lateral compartment of the joint and a relatively well-preserved patellofemoral joint. Computed tomography was carried out to better define the joint surfaces and the degree of bone destruction. The lateral reconstruction view (Fig. 2) showed significant joint and subchondral destruction on both sides of the knee joint as well as adjacent bone erosions. FIG. 1. Anteroposterior (left) and lateral (right) views of the right knee demonstrating extreme valgus deformity and joint destruction. Figure 1 continued. FIG. 2. A lateral computed tomography scan of the right knee, demonstrating bone and joint destruction with erosions on both the femoral and tibial surfaces. Because of the patient's history of prolonged hospitalization at an early age and a possible history of pulmonary tuberculosis, a tuberculin skin test was done; the results were positive. A routine culture of aspirated material from the knee yielded no growth, but a culture for Mycobacterium tuberculosis was positive, and this was confirmed by the provincial laboratory. A knee arthrodesis was carried out combined with triple therapy postoperatively, with a successful outcome. Bone and joint tuberculosis is relatively rare in Canada today. Although it is occasionally seen in immigrants from areas in which the disease remains endemic and in the Aboriginal people of North America, it should be remembered that reactivation of bone and joint tuberculosis is a possibility at any time. In patients with an unusual clinical presentation of arthritis, especially associated with rapid bone and joint destruction without evidence of purulent infection, granulomatous infection should always be considered.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".