MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W75637554

Effects of Exposure to Public Figures' Use of Psychologists on Attitude towards Help-Seeking Behavior

2008· article· en· W75637554 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Dominic J. Fauteux, Stuart J. McKelvie, Anton F. de Man

Notice bibliographique

RevueNorth American journal of psychology · 2008
Typearticle
Langueen
DomainePsychology
ThématiqueChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPsychologyStigma (botany)Mental healthSocial psychologyMental illnessPopulationPsychological researchClinical psychologyAbnormal psychologyPsychiatryMedicine
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

One-hundred-and-eighty-one university students and members of the general population were presented with either general information about psychology or with examples of well-known people who had sought professional psychological assistance for mental health issues or for performance optimization in sports. Following this, their attitude towards seeking psychological help for mental illness was measured. Contrary to expectation, attitudes were not more positive after exposure to the celebrities who had obtained help for mental health issues. However, it was found that men had a more negative attitude on the factor of stigma tolerance after exposure to models of well-known individuals who obtained professional assistance for sports performance. It is recommended that these findings be reinvestigated with changes to the experimental design. ********** The professions of dentistry and psychology provide treatments that are generally viewed negatively by the public. Nevertheless, people more readily seek help for dental problems than for psychological difficulties (Statistics Canada, 1999). People in need of psychological help often do not voluntarily seek assistance. A possible reason for this difference in attitudes may be that people who visit a dentist are not typically viewed in unfavourable terms by others, whereas people who consult a psychologist are often stigmatized (e.g., Corrigan, 2004; Komiya, Good & Sherrod, 2000; Wrigley, Jackon, Judd & Komiti, 2005). Although the roots of psychology date back a long time, there still are many misconceptions about what psychology is, the role psychologists play in society, and, more specifically, about mental illness (Barry, 1994). Such misconceptions are likely responsible for the stigma associated with mental illnesses. Negative attitudes toward individuals who grapple with these problems are prominent, notwithstanding the fact that a considerable percentage of the population suffers from some form of mental illness at least once during their lives (CPA, 2006). Because of this stigma, people often experience shame and discomfort when admitting that they have consulted or are presently consulting a mental health professional (Fischer & Turner, 1970). If this stigma is responsible for the generally reactive rather than proactive approach to mental health, then removing such stigma might lead to a more proactive approach to psychological help and services, as is the case with dentistry. The negative attitude toward mental illness and its treatments is in part the result of a lack of familiarity with and knowledge about the problems. Often, people with mental illness are perceived as dangerous (Levey & Howells, 1994), and there is the belief that they are a threat to society (Rousseau & De Man, 1998). On the other hand, direct contact with mentally ill individuals or receiving information about mental illness or its treatment has been shown to diminish such false perceptions, thereby fostering a more positive attitude toward mental illness and those suffering from such problems (Barry, 1994; Reinke, Corrigan, Leonhard, Lundin & Kubiak, 2004). Buckley and Malouff (2005) illustrated the effect of providing information on attitude change towards psychotherapy. Participants watched a video of a man and a woman who had benefited from psychotherapy, and a clinical psychologist who discussed the positive influence of therapy. The two clients described their reasons for seeking help, how constraining their problems were, how they coped with their conflicts prior to psychotherapy, what their expectations were in therapy, the therapeutic approach of their therapists, how beneficial the process was, and their personal development through the experience. A control group watched a video about psychology, describing the construct of the self. It was subsequently found that the participants in the experimental group had developed more favourable attitudes towards mental health treatment than those of the control group. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,164
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,052
Tête enseignante GPT0,331
Écart entre enseignants0,280 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations8
Publié2008
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueNorth American journal of psychologyMême sujetChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentTravaux en français237 207