MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W75637554

Effects of Exposure to Public Figures' Use of Psychologists on Attitude towards Help-Seeking Behavior

2008· article· en· W75637554 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Dominic J. Fauteux, Stuart J. McKelvie, Anton F. de Man

Bibliographic record

VenueNorth American journal of psychology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyStigma (botany)Mental healthSocial psychologyMental illnessPopulationPsychological researchClinical psychologyAbnormal psychologyPsychiatryMedicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One-hundred-and-eighty-one university students and members of the general population were presented with either general information about psychology or with examples of well-known people who had sought professional psychological assistance for mental health issues or for performance optimization in sports. Following this, their attitude towards seeking psychological help for mental illness was measured. Contrary to expectation, attitudes were not more positive after exposure to the celebrities who had obtained help for mental health issues. However, it was found that men had a more negative attitude on the factor of stigma tolerance after exposure to models of well-known individuals who obtained professional assistance for sports performance. It is recommended that these findings be reinvestigated with changes to the experimental design. ********** The professions of dentistry and psychology provide treatments that are generally viewed negatively by the public. Nevertheless, people more readily seek help for dental problems than for psychological difficulties (Statistics Canada, 1999). People in need of psychological help often do not voluntarily seek assistance. A possible reason for this difference in attitudes may be that people who visit a dentist are not typically viewed in unfavourable terms by others, whereas people who consult a psychologist are often stigmatized (e.g., Corrigan, 2004; Komiya, Good & Sherrod, 2000; Wrigley, Jackon, Judd & Komiti, 2005). Although the roots of psychology date back a long time, there still are many misconceptions about what psychology is, the role psychologists play in society, and, more specifically, about mental illness (Barry, 1994). Such misconceptions are likely responsible for the stigma associated with mental illnesses. Negative attitudes toward individuals who grapple with these problems are prominent, notwithstanding the fact that a considerable percentage of the population suffers from some form of mental illness at least once during their lives (CPA, 2006). Because of this stigma, people often experience shame and discomfort when admitting that they have consulted or are presently consulting a mental health professional (Fischer & Turner, 1970). If this stigma is responsible for the generally reactive rather than proactive approach to mental health, then removing such stigma might lead to a more proactive approach to psychological help and services, as is the case with dentistry. The negative attitude toward mental illness and its treatments is in part the result of a lack of familiarity with and knowledge about the problems. Often, people with mental illness are perceived as dangerous (Levey & Howells, 1994), and there is the belief that they are a threat to society (Rousseau & De Man, 1998). On the other hand, direct contact with mentally ill individuals or receiving information about mental illness or its treatment has been shown to diminish such false perceptions, thereby fostering a more positive attitude toward mental illness and those suffering from such problems (Barry, 1994; Reinke, Corrigan, Leonhard, Lundin & Kubiak, 2004). Buckley and Malouff (2005) illustrated the effect of providing information on attitude change towards psychotherapy. Participants watched a video of a man and a woman who had benefited from psychotherapy, and a clinical psychologist who discussed the positive influence of therapy. The two clients described their reasons for seeking help, how constraining their problems were, how they coped with their conflicts prior to psychotherapy, what their expectations were in therapy, the therapeutic approach of their therapists, how beneficial the process was, and their personal development through the experience. A control group watched a video about psychology, describing the construct of the self. It was subsequently found that the participants in the experimental group had developed more favourable attitudes towards mental health treatment than those of the control group. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.164
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNorth American journal of psychologySame topicChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207