Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Income and Expenditure 2005 Income from membership for this year was less than anticipated. Unfortunately not all branches were able to send their dues on time. Another 8,000 [euro] will be received, I expect, in 2006. I invite all branches to be punctual with sending their dues in the future. Almost all individual members paid their dues for 2005. Miscellaneous income from label sales and especially advertising was less than expected. Offshore investments produced a small return in 2005. Expenditure was much less than expected, because fewer issues of Fontes Artis Musicae were printed than anticipated. In 2005 our income exceeded expenditure. The Outreach Fund attracted no donations this year. 2005 was the 8th year in which 2.5% of all income was donated to the Outreach Fund. The amount available for Outreach for the Warsaw Conference included the 2004 donation from the Norwegian Branch. Most of our investments in HSBC International Capital Secured Growth Funds matured in 2005. An amount of US$ 50,000 was transferred to our US Bank account. During the period of our investments, economics across the world suffered a general downturn. Despite the upward trends of the markets in the last 18 months of this investment we made no profit. Our investments in HSBC global investment funds SIVAC is limited now to a small amount, with a nice profit in 2005 (from US$16,935 to US$18,869). It seems wise for the Association to have at its disposal as a reserve a sum more or less equal to one year's running costs. Membership is the main factor determining the Association's income. Membership has declined slightly over the past few years. Price increases have to be taken into account as well. As our members need to be informed well in advance about a rise in subscription dues, we'll have to decide on the increase for 2008 this year. The board prefers a gradual increase, annual if necessary, to a single, large increase. Next year (2007), as decided in Warsaw 2005, the subscriptions dues are 57 [euro] for institutions and 34 [euro] for individual members respectively. A 2% increase for 2008, as the board proposes, will result in 58 [euro] and 35 [euro] respectively. I am grateful to the 2005 auditors, Wim Klerkx and Simeon Bodden. Martie Severt, Treasurer April, 2006 ACCOUNTS 2005 Association Internationale des Bibliotheques, Archives et Centres de Documentation Musicaux (AIBM) International Association of Music Libraries, Archives and Documentation Centres (IAML) Internationale Vereinigung der Musikbibliotheken, Musikarchive und Musikdokumentationszentren (IVMB) A. RECEIPTS UK [pounds [euro] US$ sterling] 1 NATIONAL BRANCHES Australia 1812.80 Austria 844.80 Canada 2466.40 Croatia 215.00 Czech Rep. 436.45 Denmark 2798.40 Estonia 684.00 Finland 2631.00 France 3631.20 Germany 8377.60 Italy (part 2004- part 2005) 5572.00 Japan 2657.60 Netherlands 3229.60 New Zealand 677.60 Norway 3027.20 Slovakia 405.00 Spain (part 2004) 3160.00 Sweden 3432.00 Switzerland 1812.80 United Kingdom 3599.20 USA 9267.16 SUBTOTAL 51470.65 9267.16 2 INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS (incl. sales of 6585.50 256. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».