Notice bibliographique
Résumé
INCOME AND EXPENDITURE 2006 Income from membership for this year was a bit more than anticipated. Unfortunately not all branches were able to send their dues on time. Another 8,000 [euro] will be received, I expect, in 2007. I invite all branches to be punctual with sending their dues in the future, with Fontes back on schedule. Almost all individual members paid their dues for 2006. Miscellaneous income from label sales and especially advertising was less than expected. Offshore investments produced a nice return in 2006. Expenditure was less than expected, because the costs of printing and mailing Fontes were less than anticipated. Several issues of Fontes were shipped together, which reduced the costs. In 2006 our expenditure exceeded income, because we had to pay for many issues of Fontes. The Outreach Fund attracted a large donation from the Swedish Branch, which will be transferred to the Sydney Conference 2007. 2006 was the 9th year in which 2.5% of all income (minus donation) was donated to the Outreach Fund. BUDGET 2004-2006 In this period it was not necessary to revise the rate at which the [euro] is calculated from the US$ or UK [pounds sterling]. Dues were increased in 2005. Despite a small decline in membership income has been stable. Most of our investments matured in 2005 and the money was transferred to our US Bank account, unfortunately without making a profit. At the end of this period the Association had at its disposal as a reserve a sum of one year's running costs. PROPOSED BUDGET 2007-2009 As decided in 2006 dues will increase to 58 [euro] for institutions and 35 [euro] for individual members in 2008. It seems wise for the Association to have at its disposal as a reserve a sum more or less equal to one year's running costs. Membership is the main factor determining the Association's income. Price increases have to be taken into account as well. The board wants to secure our investments by selling our shares in the HSBC Global Investment Funds SICAV and transfer the value to our US Bank Account. As our members need to be informed well in advance about a rise in subscription dues, we'll have to decide on the increase for 2009 this year. The board prefers a gradual increase, annual if necessary, to a single, large increase. Therefore the board proposes a small increase of the dues to 59 [euro] and 35.50 [euro] respectively in 2009. I am grateful to the 2006 auditors, Simeon Bodden and Joost van Gemert. ACCOUNTS 2006 Association Internationale des Bibiotheques, Archives et Centres de Documentation Musicaux (AIBM) International Association of Music Libraries, Archives and Documentation Centres (IAML) Internationale Vereinigung der Musikbibliotheken, Musikarchive und Musik dokumentationszentren (IVMB) Martie Severt, treasurer February, 2007 A. RECEIPTS UK [pounds [euro] US$ sterling] 1) NATIONAL BRANCHES Australia 1,797.50 Austria 860.00 Canada 2,496.00 Croatia 308.00 Czech Rep. 494.26 Denmark 2,648.80 Estonia 721.60 Finland 2,614.00 France 3,555.20 Germany 8,201.60 Hungary 435.00 Italy (part 2005-part 2006) 5,500.00 Japan 2,486.00 Netherlands 3,176.80 New Zealand 649.00 Norway 3,176. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,005 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,005 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,335 | 0,287 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».