Bibliographic record
Abstract
INCOME AND EXPENDITURE 2006 Income from membership for this year was a bit more than anticipated. Unfortunately not all branches were able to send their dues on time. Another 8,000 [euro] will be received, I expect, in 2007. I invite all branches to be punctual with sending their dues in the future, with Fontes back on schedule. Almost all individual members paid their dues for 2006. Miscellaneous income from label sales and especially advertising was less than expected. Offshore investments produced a nice return in 2006. Expenditure was less than expected, because the costs of printing and mailing Fontes were less than anticipated. Several issues of Fontes were shipped together, which reduced the costs. In 2006 our expenditure exceeded income, because we had to pay for many issues of Fontes. The Outreach Fund attracted a large donation from the Swedish Branch, which will be transferred to the Sydney Conference 2007. 2006 was the 9th year in which 2.5% of all income (minus donation) was donated to the Outreach Fund. BUDGET 2004-2006 In this period it was not necessary to revise the rate at which the [euro] is calculated from the US$ or UK [pounds sterling]. Dues were increased in 2005. Despite a small decline in membership income has been stable. Most of our investments matured in 2005 and the money was transferred to our US Bank account, unfortunately without making a profit. At the end of this period the Association had at its disposal as a reserve a sum of one year's running costs. PROPOSED BUDGET 2007-2009 As decided in 2006 dues will increase to 58 [euro] for institutions and 35 [euro] for individual members in 2008. It seems wise for the Association to have at its disposal as a reserve a sum more or less equal to one year's running costs. Membership is the main factor determining the Association's income. Price increases have to be taken into account as well. The board wants to secure our investments by selling our shares in the HSBC Global Investment Funds SICAV and transfer the value to our US Bank Account. As our members need to be informed well in advance about a rise in subscription dues, we'll have to decide on the increase for 2009 this year. The board prefers a gradual increase, annual if necessary, to a single, large increase. Therefore the board proposes a small increase of the dues to 59 [euro] and 35.50 [euro] respectively in 2009. I am grateful to the 2006 auditors, Simeon Bodden and Joost van Gemert. ACCOUNTS 2006 Association Internationale des Bibiotheques, Archives et Centres de Documentation Musicaux (AIBM) International Association of Music Libraries, Archives and Documentation Centres (IAML) Internationale Vereinigung der Musikbibliotheken, Musikarchive und Musik dokumentationszentren (IVMB) Martie Severt, treasurer February, 2007 A. RECEIPTS UK [pounds [euro] US$ sterling] 1) NATIONAL BRANCHES Australia 1,797.50 Austria 860.00 Canada 2,496.00 Croatia 308.00 Czech Rep. 494.26 Denmark 2,648.80 Estonia 721.60 Finland 2,614.00 France 3,555.20 Germany 8,201.60 Hungary 435.00 Italy (part 2005-part 2006) 5,500.00 Japan 2,486.00 Netherlands 3,176.80 New Zealand 649.00 Norway 3,176. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".