MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W792748135

Raising Henry: A Memoir of Motherhood, Disability, and Discovery

2013· book· en· W792748135 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
R. Bingham Adams

Notice bibliographique

Revuenon disponible
Typebook
Langueen
DomaineHealth Professions
ThématiqueChild and Adolescent Health
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMemoirPrejudice (legal term)Raising (metalworking)Intervention (counseling)HavenPsychologyLawPolitical scienceEngineeringSocial psychologyPsychiatry
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The DKG Educators Award is given to a woman author whose book displays content that may influence the direction of thought and action necessary to meet the needs of today's complex society. The content must be of more than local interest with relationship, direct or implied, to education everywhere. The award committee has chosen the 2014 award recipient, Raising Henry: A Memoir of Motherhood, Disability, and Discovery, and two honorablemention books.Raising Henry: A Memoir of Motherhood, Disability, and Discovery By Rachel Adams, PhD (2013). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 272 pagesRaising Henry is a memoir of Rachel Adams's journey as a mother raising a child with Down syndrome while navigating a complex medical system. Adams describes her life as a tenured professor at Columbia University prior to this experience as both systematic and predictable. But everything changed with the birth of her second child, Henry. In this book, Adams records the first 3 years of Henry's life, as well as her reflections about becoming the mother of a child with special needs. Raising Henry is an examination of social prejudice, genetics, prenatal testing, medical training, and inclusive education. As a successful academic, Adams effectively combines material from her research with her personal experiences.The author describes the early-intervention therapists who came to her home within weeks of Henry's birth. They attended to his muscle tone, socialization skills, cognition, play, and, eventually, literacy. Adams writes,When we started early intervention, I discovered that my city is home to an army of therapists, almost all of them women, who spend their days traveling from home to home, lugging backpacks full of paperwork and equipment to treat their clients. For years I must have passed them on the sidewalk and shared seats with them on the bus, but Henry made them visible to me. (p. 86)Adams credits the intervention therapists for recognizing Henry's achievements. This wonderful group of people gave the author immense hope for Henry's future.The author recalls her memories of countless visits to a geneticist who seemed to schedule appointments with Henry so the residents could observe a child with Down syndrome. After yet another visit, she writes,I perched on my seat, silent and incredulous. It was 2009. We were sitting in the office of a respected hospital in New York City, but this felt too much like a freak show, with Henry and me as the main attractions, (p. 113)As both a scholar and the parent of a child with Down syndrome, Adams writes about the balance between working to make the world more tolerant of people with physical and intellectual disabilities and the temptation of utilizing medical cures. She goes on to discuss the innovations that may improve cognition and stave off early dementia and the ethics of plastic surgery to alter the facial characteristics of Down syndrome.Adams also describes the frustrations that she experienced as the sole manager of Henry's support network. She candidly describes the following realization:On paper, we got Henry everything he needs. But now I have to set it up. I have to find the therapists. I have to make the schedule. I have to figure out how to get him there and back. Sometimes I just feel overwhelmed, (p. 222)Raising Henry is a beautifully written book, revealing both a mother's heart and an educator's mind. This is a must read for an eclectic group of readers that would include parents, teachers, therapists, and medical professionals. Readers will be inspired by the author's determination, promise, joy, and hope that flow through each page of this work.In addition, Adams is the author of Continental Divides: Remapping the Cultures of North America (University of Chicago Press, 2009) and Sideshow U.S.A.: Freaks and the American Cultural Imagination (University of Chicago Press, 2001). She is co-editor, with David Savran, of The Masculinity Studies Reader (Blackwell Press, 2001) and, with Sarah Casteel, of a special issue of Comparative American Literature on Canada and the Americas. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,004
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,013
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,041

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0040,006
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0130,016
Communication savante0,0080,008
Science ouverte0,0010,004
Intégrité de la recherche0,0030,011
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,060
Tête enseignante GPT0,387
Écart entre enseignants0,326 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations50
Publié2013
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même sujetChild and Adolescent HealthTravaux en français237 207