MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W792748135

Raising Henry: A Memoir of Motherhood, Disability, and Discovery

2013· book· en· W792748135 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
R. Bingham Adams

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicChild and Adolescent Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMemoirPrejudice (legal term)Raising (metalworking)Intervention (counseling)HavenPsychologyLawPolitical scienceEngineeringSocial psychologyPsychiatry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The DKG Educators Award is given to a woman author whose book displays content that may influence the direction of thought and action necessary to meet the needs of today's complex society. The content must be of more than local interest with relationship, direct or implied, to education everywhere. The award committee has chosen the 2014 award recipient, Raising Henry: A Memoir of Motherhood, Disability, and Discovery, and two honorablemention books.Raising Henry: A Memoir of Motherhood, Disability, and Discovery By Rachel Adams, PhD (2013). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 272 pagesRaising Henry is a memoir of Rachel Adams's journey as a mother raising a child with Down syndrome while navigating a complex medical system. Adams describes her life as a tenured professor at Columbia University prior to this experience as both systematic and predictable. But everything changed with the birth of her second child, Henry. In this book, Adams records the first 3 years of Henry's life, as well as her reflections about becoming the mother of a child with special needs. Raising Henry is an examination of social prejudice, genetics, prenatal testing, medical training, and inclusive education. As a successful academic, Adams effectively combines material from her research with her personal experiences.The author describes the early-intervention therapists who came to her home within weeks of Henry's birth. They attended to his muscle tone, socialization skills, cognition, play, and, eventually, literacy. Adams writes,When we started early intervention, I discovered that my city is home to an army of therapists, almost all of them women, who spend their days traveling from home to home, lugging backpacks full of paperwork and equipment to treat their clients. For years I must have passed them on the sidewalk and shared seats with them on the bus, but Henry made them visible to me. (p. 86)Adams credits the intervention therapists for recognizing Henry's achievements. This wonderful group of people gave the author immense hope for Henry's future.The author recalls her memories of countless visits to a geneticist who seemed to schedule appointments with Henry so the residents could observe a child with Down syndrome. After yet another visit, she writes,I perched on my seat, silent and incredulous. It was 2009. We were sitting in the office of a respected hospital in New York City, but this felt too much like a freak show, with Henry and me as the main attractions, (p. 113)As both a scholar and the parent of a child with Down syndrome, Adams writes about the balance between working to make the world more tolerant of people with physical and intellectual disabilities and the temptation of utilizing medical cures. She goes on to discuss the innovations that may improve cognition and stave off early dementia and the ethics of plastic surgery to alter the facial characteristics of Down syndrome.Adams also describes the frustrations that she experienced as the sole manager of Henry's support network. She candidly describes the following realization:On paper, we got Henry everything he needs. But now I have to set it up. I have to find the therapists. I have to make the schedule. I have to figure out how to get him there and back. Sometimes I just feel overwhelmed, (p. 222)Raising Henry is a beautifully written book, revealing both a mother's heart and an educator's mind. This is a must read for an eclectic group of readers that would include parents, teachers, therapists, and medical professionals. Readers will be inspired by the author's determination, promise, joy, and hope that flow through each page of this work.In addition, Adams is the author of Continental Divides: Remapping the Cultures of North America (University of Chicago Press, 2009) and Sideshow U.S.A.: Freaks and the American Cultural Imagination (University of Chicago Press, 2001). She is co-editor, with David Savran, of The Masculinity Studies Reader (Blackwell Press, 2001) and, with Sarah Casteel, of a special issue of Comparative American Literature on Canada and the Americas. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.041

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0130.016
Scholarly communication0.0080.008
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0030.011
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.387
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations50
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicChild and Adolescent HealthFrench-language works237,207