Digital self-determination: Aboriginal peoples and the network society in Canada
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Digital Self-Determination: Aboriginal peoples and the network society in Canada"Digital self-determination seeks to elaborate the links between networked digital infrastructure development and the autonomy and agency of indigenous peoples.It foregrounds how indigenous peoples are involved in the diffusion, construction, governance, and use of networked digital infrastructures.Importantly, it considers how these infrastructures are not only tools of emancipation, but can increase the surveillance and control of indigenous peoples by powerful state and corporate interests.They can also extend the historic and ongoing reality of the 'offline' economic, social, political, and cultural marginalization of indigenous peoples by colonial powers.However, to accept such negative effects at face value is to fall into the trap of the teleological fallacies of social and technical determinism.Instead, in this dissertation I argue that indigenous peoples can shape and use networked digital infrastructures to support their self-determination.These processes are often guided by a recognition of self-determination that is grounded in and emergent from diverse indigenous laws, customs, and institutions.This frames digital self-determination with reference to the long-term and ongoing work of indigenous peoples to shape their own community-based media organizations and endogenous development projects.My dissertation considers these issues as they articulate with several facets of digital self-determination.I ground my argument in empirical research on the Northern Indigenous Community Satellite Network (NICSN), a cooperative socio-technical network spanning the northern regions of three Canadian provinces: Ontario, Quebec, and Manitoba.NICSN involves two First Nations Tribal Councils and a regional government that administers the Inuit territory of Nunavik.These partners collaborated to build and manage regional infrastructure in ways that reflect the needs of their constituent communities.I explore how these institutions are taking control and ownership of the infrastructures that enable their development and use of online v applications.Moving beyond considerations of access, I frame these infrastructures as socially shaped platforms of agency that mediate relations between indigenous peoples and the global network society.They are the result of dynamic negotiations and struggles between political actors seeking to advance normative agendas.These activities play out in the formation of frameworks of subsidies and regulatory conditions that reflect attempts to decolonize state-based policies and institutions associated with networked digital infrastructure development.Finally, I end with a discussion of how indigenous peoples and governments are developing online applications, from social media to broadband-enabled health and education applications.Negotiating the requirements of existing jurisdictional and administrative structures, they are shaping these platforms into spaces of convergence that reflect their goals of self-determination.Throughout this dissertation, I situate my observations in broader political, economic, and cultural contexts to elaborate both the promise and the challenge of digital selfdetermination.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,005 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,040 | 0,014 |
| Communication savante | 0,009 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,006 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».