MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W802604818

The Socialist Register 2014, Registering Class

2014· article· en· W802604818 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Howard A. Doughty

Notice bibliographique

Revue˜The œinnovation journal · 2014
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiquePolitical Economy and Marxism
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésIdeologyPoliticsMarxist philosophyState (computer science)LawSociologyLeft-wing politicsEconomic historyDemocracyClass conflictPolitical sciencePolitical economyHistory
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Leo Panitch, Greg Albo and Vivek Chibber, eds. The Socialist Register 2014, Registering Class New York, NY: Monthly Review Press, 2014Reviewed by Howard A. DoughtyIt seems that, despite disrepute that Marxism has endured since implosion of Soviet Union, old fellow may have gotten a few more things right than is commonly accepted within briefly triumphant neoliberal circles. These circles have pretty much defined dominant ideological perspective among Western liberal democracies and also in those developing nations, especially on Pacific Rim, that have displayed remarkable economic growth over past few decades.Mainly stuck away in small fissures in solid rocks of North American academy and in geological crannies and nooks of European intellectual formations, Marxist theory and scholarship is fairly safely contained. It barely intrudes into world of corporate think-tanks, financial media and policy development stratagems of mainstream political parties. In fact, it seems no longer to be very interesting to agents of national security state who are apparently more preoccupied with Islamic jihads, Ukrainian separatists and opportunities for covert actions and regime changes elsewhere.That said, initially in land where the Moor spent his most fruitful years in British Museum, and now at York University in Canada, one of most durable intellectual journals devoted to leftist perspectives on events continues to offer refreshing analyses and criticisms of late capitalist political economy. I speak, of course, of The Socialist Register. (Another is The Monthly Review which has been operating since 1949 and which enjoys convivial relations with The Socialist Register, an annual publication printed in North America by Monthly Review Press and in London, England by Merlin.)The Socialist Register was begun by exemplary British historians, John Saville and Ralph Miliband (whose son, Ed, currently leads Her Majesty's Loyal Opposition in United Kingdom). This year marks its Fiftieth Anniversary and event should be marked with celebration by any serious student (or teacher) of contemporary political thought whether or not annual periodical's expressed views are consistent with their own. You don't have to be a socialist to enjoy The Socialist Register, all that's needed is an appreciation of rigorous thinking and intelligent writing on matters of global political importance.Each year, The Socialist Register addresses a main theme. This year, theme is social class. And this is where Marx's prescience becomes pertinent. When I said at outset that Marx got some things right, I was thinking of his view (controversial within certain circles), that social evolution required that human societies, like biological species, must follow a logical (but not a predetermined) evolutionary path. Just as humanity could not have sprung fully formed from loins of Lucy or any other Australopithecine some millions of years ago, socialism and ultimately communism could not be created out of semi-feudal wreckage of Asian societies. So, just as Homo sapiens needed interim stages of development to become fully modern humans, so also human social development needs to go through stages to fulfill Marx's admittedly vague premonition of what might happen when (as it must, all things do) capitalism falls victim to its own internal contradictions.Impatient souls such as V. I. Lenin and Mao Zedong were unwilling to wait for history to take its natural course. They were convinced that they could defy evolutionists' creed that Natura non facit saltus (Nature does not make leaps), which had been part of scientific thinking at least since Aristotle, made explicit by either Newton or Leibniz (or vice versa) and made an essential part of Darwin's particular theory of evolution. Besotted with idea of a vanguard of proletariat, both Bolsheviks and Maoists insisted that they could make a great leap forward or maybe two of them and thus catapult pre-capitalist Russia and China into fully-formed communist societies. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,005
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,134
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,447

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0050,016
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0060,012
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0030,002
Communication savante0,0130,012
Science ouverte0,0020,004
Intégrité de la recherche0,0040,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,1340,081

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,036
Tête enseignante GPT0,313
Écart entre enseignants0,277 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations9
Publié2014
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revue˜The œinnovation journalMême sujetPolitical Economy and MarxismTravaux en français237 207