Bibliographic record
Abstract
Leo Panitch, Greg Albo and Vivek Chibber, eds. The Socialist Register 2014, Registering Class New York, NY: Monthly Review Press, 2014Reviewed by Howard A. DoughtyIt seems that, despite disrepute that Marxism has endured since implosion of Soviet Union, old fellow may have gotten a few more things right than is commonly accepted within briefly triumphant neoliberal circles. These circles have pretty much defined dominant ideological perspective among Western liberal democracies and also in those developing nations, especially on Pacific Rim, that have displayed remarkable economic growth over past few decades.Mainly stuck away in small fissures in solid rocks of North American academy and in geological crannies and nooks of European intellectual formations, Marxist theory and scholarship is fairly safely contained. It barely intrudes into world of corporate think-tanks, financial media and policy development stratagems of mainstream political parties. In fact, it seems no longer to be very interesting to agents of national security state who are apparently more preoccupied with Islamic jihads, Ukrainian separatists and opportunities for covert actions and regime changes elsewhere.That said, initially in land where the Moor spent his most fruitful years in British Museum, and now at York University in Canada, one of most durable intellectual journals devoted to leftist perspectives on events continues to offer refreshing analyses and criticisms of late capitalist political economy. I speak, of course, of The Socialist Register. (Another is The Monthly Review which has been operating since 1949 and which enjoys convivial relations with The Socialist Register, an annual publication printed in North America by Monthly Review Press and in London, England by Merlin.)The Socialist Register was begun by exemplary British historians, John Saville and Ralph Miliband (whose son, Ed, currently leads Her Majesty's Loyal Opposition in United Kingdom). This year marks its Fiftieth Anniversary and event should be marked with celebration by any serious student (or teacher) of contemporary political thought whether or not annual periodical's expressed views are consistent with their own. You don't have to be a socialist to enjoy The Socialist Register, all that's needed is an appreciation of rigorous thinking and intelligent writing on matters of global political importance.Each year, The Socialist Register addresses a main theme. This year, theme is social class. And this is where Marx's prescience becomes pertinent. When I said at outset that Marx got some things right, I was thinking of his view (controversial within certain circles), that social evolution required that human societies, like biological species, must follow a logical (but not a predetermined) evolutionary path. Just as humanity could not have sprung fully formed from loins of Lucy or any other Australopithecine some millions of years ago, socialism and ultimately communism could not be created out of semi-feudal wreckage of Asian societies. So, just as Homo sapiens needed interim stages of development to become fully modern humans, so also human social development needs to go through stages to fulfill Marx's admittedly vague premonition of what might happen when (as it must, all things do) capitalism falls victim to its own internal contradictions.Impatient souls such as V. I. Lenin and Mao Zedong were unwilling to wait for history to take its natural course. They were convinced that they could defy evolutionists' creed that Natura non facit saltus (Nature does not make leaps), which had been part of scientific thinking at least since Aristotle, made explicit by either Newton or Leibniz (or vice versa) and made an essential part of Darwin's particular theory of evolution. Besotted with idea of a vanguard of proletariat, both Bolsheviks and Maoists insisted that they could make a great leap forward or maybe two of them and thus catapult pre-capitalist Russia and China into fully-formed communist societies. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.016 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.012 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.012 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.134 | 0.081 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".