Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Although I have lived uninterruptedly in British Columbia longer than any other place in my life, I am not a native-born Canadian. I was born in England, raised in the United States, and emigrated to Canada in 1987. In some respects I am an embodiment of what is becoming the Canadian reality: an immigrant who has found the Canadian context to be life-giving and, if I may use the term, natural. But Canada is my home if not my native land because it is here that I have spent twenty-eight of the thirty-one years since my ordination to the transitional diaconate in June of 1981.We Canadians treasure our connections with Anglicans throughout the world yet we are consciously North American, valuing the wisdom of our neighbors to the south while, at the same time, valuing our Commonwealth ties. Perhaps it is these two characteristics that make me feel so at home here, the son of a mother from England and a father from the United States.So, what is about in Canada, eh?Re-visiting the SourcesIf one wants to know what is about common prayer in the Anglican tradition, a good place to start is the Prayer Book of 1549. Archbishop Cranmer used the Preface and a concluding editorial, Of Ceremonies Omitted or Retained, to articulate a number of principles which have shaped Anglican worship for the past four hundred and fifty years.1) Liturgy is the product of human activity and thus susceptible to decay and distortion: There was never anything by the wit of man so well devised, or so surely established, which (in continuance of time) hath not been corrupted: as (among other things) it may plainly appear by the prayers in the Church.12) Regular and thorough reading of the scriptures is a norm for Christian worship: [The ancient fathers] so ordered the matter, that all the whole Bible (or the greatest part thereof) should be read over once in the year, intending thereby . . . that the people (by daily hearing of holy scripture read in the Church) should continually profit more and more in the knowledge of God.23) Liturgy is to be conducted in the vernacular rather than a hieratic language: And moreover, . . . Paul would have such language spoken to the people in the church, as they might understand and have profit by hearing the same.34) Simplicity and clarity rather than complexity and obscurity is a characteristic of authentic worship : Moreover, the number and hardness of the rules called the pie, and the manifold changings of the service, was the cause, that to turn the book only, was so hard and intricate a matter, that many times, there was more business to find out what should be read, than to read it when it was found out.45) Worship should unite people of a culture: And where heretofore, there hath been great diversity in saying and singing in churches within this realm: some following Salisbury use, some Hereford use, some the use of Bangor, some of York, and some of Lincoln: Now from henceforth, all the whole realm shall have but one use.56) Bishops are called to exercise pastoral stewardship of the liturgical life of their dioceses·. And forsomuch as nothing can, almost, be so plainly set forth, but doubts may rise in the use and practicing of the same: . . . the parties that so doubt, or diversely take anything, shall always resort to the Bishop of the Diocese, who by his discretion shall take order for the quieting and appeasing of the same: so that the same order be not contrary to anything contained in this book.67) English is not a privileged liturgical language; if the people understand another language, then it is suitable for worship (see number 3 above): Though it be appointed in the afore written preface, that all things shall be read and sung in the church, in the English tongue, to the end that the congregation may be thereby edified: yet it is not meant, but when men say Matins and Evensong privately, they may say the same in any language that they themselves do understand. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».